Dark

Smart Energy Systems: 100% Renewable Energy at a National Level (Full Version)

EnergyPLAN
Подписаться
Просмотров 294 367
95% 2 243 96

Get more info here about the research conducted in the Sustainable Energy Planning Group at Aalborg University:
www.EnergyPLAN.eu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Smart Energy Systems: 100% Renewable Energy at a National Level (Full Version)
Denmark has decided to become independent from fossil fuels. For the sake of the climate, the economy, and in order to ensure security of energy supply. This film shows how this will happen based on research conducted at Aalborg University (www.smartenergysystems.eu).
At present wind and solar energy already delivers a good share of Denmark's energy, but renewable energy is a major challenge for an energy system that is built upon fossil fuels. Energy production from wind and solar fluctuates - it fluctuates as the wind blows. So what renewables are reliable when there is no sun or wind energy available?
Another challenge is the transport sector. How do we create an energy system of renewable energy, where also cars, ships and planes can operate on fossil-free energy? A great example of an energy system that will ensure Denmark a 100% renewable energy system is called: Smart Energy Systems - a coherent, fossil-free energy system that will create lots of new jobs and green energy for the Danes, both in terms of electricity, heat and transport.
Production courtesy of:
www.webwall.tv/blueplanetinnovation
www.blueplanetinnovation.dk

Наука и техника

Опубликовано:

 

28 ноя 2014

Energy SystemsRenewable Energy (Industry)100% Renewable EnergyPower

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии 324
humaid alqubaisi
humaid alqubaisi Месяц назад
Complicated solutions , re digesting inefficient systems like solar and ugly wind systems is obviously not the way to the future. hanging to a "straw" should not be the way to the future also . forcing people to limit their freedom to use public transport is not the future. the solution will be simpler , more independence and freedom to all with innovative and simpler , much simpler solutions will take us from the past to the future.
Tore Lund
Tore Lund Месяц назад
How nice for once to hear intelligent people carefully getting the complete picture and actually having the numbers check out as opposed to Danish politicians that either think getting EVs without any other energy infrastructure investments will solve global warming or small changes to lifestyle will makes us fulfil the Paris agreement. If Danish politicians were smart they would pass a law stating that no politician is allowed to make decisions about energy without consulting engineers or at least someone that understands thermodynamics.
Tom Kelly
Tom Kelly 2 месяца назад
I think that most of this looks like a fine plan to me but hydrogen production through electrolysis of water is not a good idea. It is far too inefficient at storing energy. The conversion losses are massive. Batteries and compressed air are much better options. Also where is the hydro power in this? Hydro dams are excellent grid scale batteries
Væringjar
Væringjar 14 дней назад
Tom Kelly in order to build hydro plants you need the water to have gravitational potential energy, Denmark is flatter than a pancake, so not a solution there. This system is supposed to be solution for areas with no natural resources.
joe allen
joe allen 3 месяца назад
if you don't want a future full of energy poverty, you have to include nuclear.
MS W
MS W 3 месяца назад
Wind, solar and wave energy are not effective and efficiency if compared with nuclear energy
David G
David G 5 месяцев назад
I came across this new game changing energy solution. If what they claim is true then it's the solution. ruvid.net/video/видео-V4MOKvzmbZY.html They also have videos of testes performed proving their statements. They are asking us to spread the word - You need to see this, I'm convinced...
JN-Pro HD
JN-Pro HD 7 месяцев назад
hi everyone ,if anyone else wants to learn about solar power free install try Ewans energy roadmap (just google it ) ? Ive heard some unbelievable things about it and my partner got amazing success with it.
Ernest Hemingway
Ernest Hemingway 8 месяцев назад
Wow!!! Why can't we all do this?
GaunletofDestruction
GaunletofDestruction 6 месяцев назад
Beats me!
Straight Whitemale
Straight Whitemale 8 месяцев назад
Once society learns to live in the renewable energy world this becomes simple. Stop being so spoiled and greedy. Learn to live with fluctuating energy, stop demanding energy any time you want. Live differently, consider working during dark hours, the energy for lighting would be more than offset by air conditioning costs.
Patel Vidhu
Patel Vidhu 9 месяцев назад
No need to do so much things. use solar to generate electricity. Generate hydrogen using electrolysis and use fuel cell to re generate electricity.
Laticia Cull
Laticia Cull 9 месяцев назад
Go to Avasva page if you want to learn how to build it yourself
kareszt
kareszt 10 месяцев назад
Yo guys do it with Lego, Jews can go Hego, US and China: 8 or us is welcome for 5
Sun Shine
Sun Shine 10 месяцев назад
It is amazing that Denmark could achieve all this. It is a leading country in solar and wind power yet Denmark does not have too much wind and sun. Also it has a population of less than 6 million. It takes a lot of planning and commitment! Congratulation!
Tore Lund
Tore Lund Месяц назад
Yet, the Danish average CO2 footprint per person is 14 tonnes yearly, higher than Germany and not far behind the Americans. CO2 doesn't care how it is made and Danes Fly a lot and buy a lot of consumer goods. Also commuting by car is rewarded by tax deduction (60 cents/mile). So having the Greenest energy production infrastructure, does not give Denmark a free pass to gloat.
Peter Campbell
Peter Campbell 10 месяцев назад
U v l Magnification.Intense Solar Light Heat Energy in Abundance..Solar Spherical Spinning U v l Magnification Intense Solar Light Heating Energy Reactors Globally.These Solar U v l Magnification Spherical Spinning Solar Reactors would Produce Bountiful Amounts of Solar U v l Magnification Intense Solar Heating Light Energy .Building U.v.l Solar Light Heat Energy Transformers to Rest Solar Spherical Spinning Spheres on Transforming All U v l Magnification Solar Light Intense Light Energy Rays into Useable Solar Electrical Light Energy. Solar Power Engineers to Build New Solar U v l Magnification Spinning Spherical Spheres and U v l Magnification Light Heat Transformers to Capture And Convert All Solar U v l Magnification Light Intense Heat Energy into Useable Solar Light U v l Magnification Electrical Energy Globally.Beautiful Safe Solar Spinning Spherical Spheres ENVIROMENTAL Solar Electrical Light Energy Reactors Kind to Supply Our Workd with Safe Kind Free Solar U v l Magnification Intense Heat Light Rays Solar Energy Into Our World All Global Enviroments .
Iain Reid
Iain Reid 10 месяцев назад
Denmark is currently in the enviable position of being able to rely on Norway's large reserves of hydro electric power. So when the winds not blowing, Norway fills the gap. If the wind generated electricity is in abundance, Norway takes the excess to refill their pump storage dams. Denmark pays a lot for Norways power and gets much less when it sells back to Norway. Hence the high cost of electricty in Denmark. It is not a model for other countries to copy.
TeternalGIone
TeternalGIone 10 месяцев назад
Kill the money save the world! No nuclear is not the way!
Iain Reid
Iain Reid 11 месяцев назад
It is technically impossible to get 100% of our electricity (never mind energy) from conventional renwables. (I exclude biomass, as it is used, as it emitts CO2 and destroys forests due to the volume required) As is known the sun doesn't shine all the time and solar output is variable due to the angle of incidence of the sun and the clarity of the atmoshere. Cloud, rain and snow seriously degrade solar output. There are times that the wind is very weak and as the output varies as a square law (A rough estimation, worse at lower speed and less at higher ones) power drops off quickly as wind speed drops. The other associated problem with wind speed and direction is in blustery conditions the output is unstable and adversely affects all devices connected to the grid. The amount of storage to balance all the above very real problems is unsustainable. The thought that storage is the answer but neglects to factor in the extra power needed to re fill the storage devices from a very variable source. Simply put trusting the weather to perform. Would you want to bet on that? You cannot beat the physics of the system and as all sources of energy have known energy density, it's obvious that renewables are a poor choice as they all have very low energy density.
Admiralhall2000
Admiralhall2000 11 месяцев назад
The best course for the domestic scale micro-renewables is www.udemy.com/micro-renewable-energy/
Carl Taylor
Carl Taylor 11 месяцев назад
Every country in Europe could do this following the brilliant Danish plan. The UK could use more wave and wind power whereas Spain would use sun, wave and wind. We could eliminate the need for oil completely and reduce CO2 emissions drastically.
Solexx X
Solexx X Год назад
LFTR is the bridge. Making synthetic carbon based fuels solves nothing.
Mehedi Hasan Nayeem
Mehedi Hasan Nayeem Год назад
Great Energy Plan for next generation! Denmark will be an example to other countries.
james anderson
james anderson Год назад
Oh so they will-burn food for electricity. That is what they are doing.
Roger Reimer
Roger Reimer Год назад
No such thing as renewable energy it takes 240.000 tons of C02 to build a 3 million dollar wind mill because of all the coal you have to burn to make the 32,000 tons of cement 12,000 tons of re-bar for an 80 meter wind turbine plus all the coal needed to make the steel transmission and bearings plus the oil needed to make the carbon propeller. Then all the lubricant for the $250,000 transmission and bearings which may last 10 or 15 year at most. The new cement wind mill may last 35 or more years over water a lot less. At the end of 35 year the decommissioning of the bird killer may take as much C02 as the construction. One massive farm is now being decommissioned in Alberta the cost and the dangers are very high.
Mario Miranda
Mario Miranda Год назад
Watch cowspiracy on Netflix
Taiwo Olaleye
Taiwo Olaleye Год назад
just use nuclear
Graham Spink
Graham Spink Год назад
Denmark is looking to the future in a scientific way ....We all need to follow their advanced planning systems ...
Kadin Hernandez
Kadin Hernandez Год назад
Several families use up electricity openly and end up receiving a $200-$500 power bill. There are instances when even a rich family can`t seem to afford amounts like this for the upcoming months. This is a generating power method “boma fetching unique” (Google it) to cut your electricity bill and generate your own power.
Gamle Ole
Gamle Ole Год назад
The danes made sure no one gets an advance by installing solar panels just to protect the monopoly of the energy company.
Aaron Goyvaerts
Aaron Goyvaerts Год назад
Methanol!!!!!!! Are you crazy!!!!!!! Are you seriously planning on powering cars with methanol!!!!!!! Do you have any idea wat that does to the human body!!!!!
Balanced Stereo
Balanced Stereo Год назад
CONSTANT & Clean "TIDAL & GEOTHERMAL" Sources would "Overpower" inconsistent Wind & Solar sources - plus MAG-LEV, FARADAY & ELECTRIC CAR GRID Expansions, all could probably SAVE THE WORLD - after we OVERPOWER Fossil Fuel Interests!!
monoham1
monoham1 Год назад
if electric cars will use a 3rd of a countries electricity, can't you just increase the price of electricity for cars when there's no wind on Monday and store excess electricity until it stays blowing again on Thursday and then lower the price again? people should be able to get by on their own local solar power or buy increased price stored power If they're going somewhere while renewables and stored power generate 110% to 200% of the remaining energy... needs....
Amos Maclin
Amos Maclin Год назад
now on the forest u still planting a tree back for everyone u take
Plainglasswindows
Plainglasswindows Год назад
I'm just sitting here in Houston after the Hurricane. The refineries (Exxon, Valero, etc.) took advantage and flooded our air with benzene. They thought, "you know what, fuck these people" and decided to help the hurricane kill us
Troy Range
Troy Range Год назад
*_One of the best books [link here::_**_twitter.com/rollrockn42/status/895831237465526272_**_ ] for Design and full understanding on solar panel systems ,,, if used in full ,, results are great ,,, as posted_*
Wellington Boobs
Wellington Boobs Год назад
I wonder if theresa may will ever see something like this and then tell the British population why they can't have it and why what they have now -- rising energy poverty because of profiteering -- is superior. Will it be tougher regulations or fewer regulations to fix the unfixable? Stay tooned ...
Evan Speis
Evan Speis Год назад
I see the hitman agent 47 has taken up narrating documentaries.
Hachi de Fibonacci
Hachi de Fibonacci Год назад
Water prices will rise. Learn to conserve water. Nation wise a country must lower it's water consumption.
Ruth Rogers
Ruth Rogers Год назад
Saltwater Batteries or Energy Storage
Theodoяe Kяap
Theodoяe Kяap Год назад
There's nothing green about this "green gas" they're talking about, burning that gas does produce carbon emissions does not matter if you use solar/wind energy to produce it. Unless you use Hydrogen/Oxygen or HHO then you're going to emit carbon. period.
Tore Lund
Tore Lund Месяц назад
Burning natural gas less bad because a higher portion of its energy content is from Hydrogen so less CO2/kWh. But on its own it is nowhere green enough to make a difference. The only truly carbon free liquid fuel is Ammonia that is only Nitrogen and Hydrogen. This can be made by renewable sources and transported as a liquid at low pressure, used in car directly decomposed through a catalyst as Hydrogen.
James Rosemary
James Rosemary 2 месяца назад
Carbon emited by burning green gas equals the carbon secuestred in wood and agricultural waste. So the net balance is zero.
Rodrigo Amoedo
Rodrigo Amoedo 2 месяца назад
no budy,
Tom Kelly
Tom Kelly 2 месяца назад
It is good to emit some CO2. Plants need it!
Stacey Story
Stacey Story Год назад
Biogas solutions is remarkable
Armando Zessar
Armando Zessar Год назад
What about tomorrow after Earth axis changing because poles melting wind directions are also changing?
Garret Krampe
Garret Krampe Год назад
Makes me laugh when I invent this stuff back in 2009 and never found any funding.
craig silta
craig silta Год назад
The more we utilize energy fully we will find less reasons to work and this will decrease demand. The whole economy is driven by energy but is the major reason why we work so by creating energy independence we will refine the reasons why we work and eliminate unnecessary processes that are nothing more then a drain on resources and that are a negative benefit to society. It will be much like the dissolving of the monopoly of AT&T. What will happen in a short time will be a complete shift in why people work. Cause 80 percent of every dollar is just to support the use of energy and is the driving force behind money so will utilizing energy better we will reduce the need to work and the justification of comforts to oil and energy companies who want to continue to be their slave to ignorance. Over half the world represents the interests and well being of a digital number so these people are really working against us instead of for us because every decision made in moneys interests goes against human and natures interests. Which is more important?
Jens Østergård
Jens Østergård Год назад
Unfortunately the danish people elected a parliament in 2015 that delays these visions.
Aravinth K
Aravinth K Год назад
super
John Eddy
John Eddy Год назад
Thanks 4 all U do!! U’ll like my song: “Evolution” soundcloud.com/3-412/6-evolution
rangemog21
rangemog21 Год назад
I wrote it somewhere before, there is no such thing as RENEWABLE energy; not out of the sun, it will die out at the end, not of the wind, becouse the wind will be gone at the same time. Yep, but it will not be as long as we live...Right, we will even be gone before that. You use energy, clean energy or other, it's gone for ever. But, my advice, use sun and windenergy as long it is there !!!
peterb6245
peterb6245 Год назад
for electricity generatiwe use solar, wind, and pumped hydro for transport we grow crude oil with algae...takes two weeks....check university of california san diego rofessor stephen mayfield
HairlessHare
HairlessHare Год назад
To each their own. Stop saying solar or nuclear or whatever is the future. It depends on where you are. Middle east can't go biomass but they are suited for solar. some countries have wind others don't. Iceland can benefit from geothermal others not so much. No single energy source is "the future". There is no magic bullet. To each their own.
Omnipitous
Omnipitous 2 месяца назад
The whole point of this video is to show the diversity of green options. I don't understand how you missed this point.
kkknotcool
kkknotcool 2 года назад
"create lots of new jobs" is just code for "very expensive."
Rudolf Zölde
Rudolf Zölde 2 года назад
Environmental technologies. Technology offer Performance multiplier, with milliwatt to megawatt. High performance gain with the successfully tested pulse technology. The novel power optimization is a simulated energy source as an electronic device (EPM, electronic power gain multiplier) and over 1000 km of long distance in series or parallel, connected to primary energy such as accumulator, photovoltaic, fuel cell and is generally applicable in the electrical engineering sector with impulse drive for electric vehicles, track, electric aircraft, space and shipping, thermoelectric generators (patent) and in the household save 50% electric heating costs. Innovative Technologies - RZ-IT Rudolf Zölde samplingtec@gmail.com www.rz-innovatec.com If 100 liters of petrol are consumed for a route from A to B, 70 liters are converted to heat and 30 liters to moving energy.
Neil Lizotte
Neil Lizotte 2 года назад
Why not LENR?
Neil Lizotte
Neil Lizotte 2 года назад
Why not LENR?
Rishab Dubey
Rishab Dubey 2 года назад
very informative :) (Y)
BlezentFott
BlezentFott 2 года назад
The future renewable and alternative energy source is SONGS. Go to my channel titled A New Alternative Source of Energy for Vehicles.
George LFC
George LFC 2 года назад
Ok so how do you make the renewable energy solar panels, or the wind generation plants oh that's right with fossil fuels. How do you replace a wind turbine motor out in the sea, oh yes with a fecking helicopter powered by fossil fuels. Yes it's great to save money in the short term on energy but to make one solar panel means that; that one panel needs to run for 25 years without breaking down before it even becomes carbon neutral before it even starts to pay back to the climate.. green energy is a joke and is not the solution to our problems...
George LFC
George LFC 2 года назад
MrKohlenstoff I don't but I deal with sustainability all day, and all you have to do is the numbers. Eg take wind generation it takes a huge amount of iron ore to dig out of the ground all with heavy machinery run on fossil fuels, then there is transport, making it, more transport, plus people power because hey 90% of western people eat meat and dairy which is huge on its own. Anyway if it takes at least 10 years for the fossil fuels we burn today to have its effect on the planet and then you factor in breakdown costs, maintenance costs (again people) and each time you replace a component or even do maintenance on it another 10 years kicks in for that task. Even being conservative it is at least 10 years, if we went on a building spree of green energy today the amount of fossil fuels we would burn to make it, in 10 years would put us past the target rate regardless of how green it runs today the damage in manufacturing is were the issue is. We should have done it 30 years ago..
MrKohlenstoff
MrKohlenstoff 2 года назад
@George LFC you got a source for that 25 years claim? According to this www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/35489.pdf for instance, it's 1-4 years. Of course depends on many factors though.
George LFC
George LFC 2 года назад
@ james you know that thing between your ears it's called a brain you should try using it sometimes. Stop looking at the end product and focus on the manufacturing process..
BlezentFott
BlezentFott 2 года назад
Electric car is a WASTE of energy, for hydrogen fuel cars, hydrogen should be used as combustible fuel instead of generating electricity from fuel cells.
BlezentFott
BlezentFott 2 года назад
You're right. Combustion engine is lot less efficient than H2 fuel cells. Hydrogen would be a good clean energy storage chemical alternative to chemicals found in batteries. Better yet, go to my channel and the video that talks about New Alternative Fuel source for Automobiles, which are Songs.
MrKohlenstoff
MrKohlenstoff 2 года назад
cleantechnica.com/2015/06/26/hydrogen-cars-lost-much-support/ doesn't sound too convincing to me. Anything wrong with the arguments?
pitsaria poueskise
pitsaria poueskise 2 года назад
ah god. those people are idiots. and that makes me worry most is that they work in a university. those people are idiots.
Gregory Howard
Gregory Howard 2 года назад
I'm pro-choice on energy
maral2014 nuclear
maral2014 nuclear 2 года назад
and with nuclear, you don't need the energy saving BS.
Theodoяe Kяap
Theodoяe Kяap Год назад
we could bury the nuclear waste under earth's crust in the mantle, it will sink deeper since it's heavier than molten rock and we wouldn't have to worry about it. However, we would lose that material forever, so that's the downside.
ftbsecret
ftbsecret 2 года назад
The now standart nucleair reactors cost way to much to build, already build ones for the time being are cost effective to keep open mostly but nobody will invest in new plants. Thorium will all depend on price, they are claimed to be cheaper but such projects never stay in budget it always seems. It will come down to price, nobody is going to build huge expencive plants if renewables are cheaper (I mean including storage) Maybe Japan/france build some thorium plants before renewable prices drop below the point that nobody wants to compete anymore. I can't predict the future its possible price drops lvl out on renewables and the thorium plant is as cheap as they claim, in that case we will see more of them =P But I don't expect that to happen
mynoks
mynoks 2 года назад
thorium seems way way more safe. So if we move to thorium (while increasing renewable a lot) we can agree yes.
maral2014 nuclear
maral2014 nuclear 2 года назад
we could settle on thorium? thorium almost uses 99% of all of its fuel. If we where to make this reactor, waste would be solved. :D
mynoks
mynoks 2 года назад
I guess you mean "... won all of them..." Current nuclear power plants are quite good in submarines and aircraft carriers (with limitless water) as they were designed on Navy requirements, which do not translate so well into civil inland applications. In the short term nuclear seems necessary (specially if you consider the CO2 emissions of coal or gas) but unless fusion is achieved or we move to salt molter reactors I still think (and can support with facts) that nuclear must only be used for very specific situations and not for mass energy production. And again in the economic part, try to also include the crazy amount of time that some radioactive waste need to be secured (only that part make nuclear the most expensive energy of all)
maral2014 nuclear
maral2014 nuclear 2 года назад
Look, Denmark is not that huge of a country. they can rely on that stuff. but bigger country's need nuclear.
I A Reid
I A Reid Год назад
Hello Jacob, Solar and wind can never be cheaper when they need to have almost 100% capacity back up from thermal or hydro stations. (Incidentally hydro dams give off huge amounts of CO2It is economic folly to not consider the overall cost of the complete system.
maral2014 nuclear
maral2014 nuclear Год назад
I wonder why nobody is thinking about Stirling engines .
Jacob
Jacob Год назад
+I A Reid It's not as simple as you put it. Denmark sells wind energy to Norway during nighttime in order for them to pump the water back up in the dams, during daytime they then generate power. Denmark also get about 40% of their energy from wind alone, now put on top of that hydroelectric energy from Norway and it makes up for more than 1/3rd. Both solar and wind has become much cheaper in the past years, and if done right, the energy can actually be cheaper than conventional forms. But it all depends on where the country is located.
maral2014 nuclear
maral2014 nuclear 2 года назад
I do think that hydro and nuclear would be the best for the world, or perpetual motion even.
I A Reid
I A Reid 2 года назад
Denmark is not able to rely on their renewable generation, only about 1/3 rd of their power is renewable. What they do rely on is their neighbour Norway which has large hydro generation capacity, That is just fortunate for Denmark that their geography is suitable for hydro which is a very good source of power, Many countries do not have that resource. Wind and solar are pretty poor sorces of power, and time has proven this to be so. Neither are the future.
Raj Kumar
Raj Kumar 2 года назад
Nuclear power energy is future .
maral2014 nuclear
maral2014 nuclear 2 года назад
We need more nuclear!
Mauro Scimone
Mauro Scimone 2 года назад
Little adjustement in my opinion: LED lighting instead of fluorescent, More EV and Hybrid solutions for transports, Chemical Batteries for storage, next gen batteries will be more energy capable; in the future next solar generation include cheap and flexible Perovskite high performance thin film and module, so great solar improvement also for transports integration and PV windows for energy efficiency buildings too!!
ftbsecret
ftbsecret 2 года назад
+ George LFC what a amount of unfunden fantasy numbers whoa! First off all you know the opposite direction is being taken? They now use solar to extract oil that would be to expencive to get to otherwise? qz.com/618391/the-oil-industry-has-invented-an-ironic-new-use-for-solar-power/ Those things Mauro listed can perfectly be made without oil in the future, biggest source of energy is the grid and its a flatout lie to claim a ICE car is better for the envoirement as a EV. You can make up a lot of bogus science and post ridiculous claims on some youtube forum but for what? Get a life.
George LFC
George LFC 2 года назад
Mauro Scimone you do know that everything you just mentioned is made by fossil fuels and can only be made by fossil fuels there is no other way to make it.. and everything made by fossil fuels has a 25 year carbon neutral cycle which means it doesn't start paying back to the climate until after the 25 years. The electric car for example uses so much fossil fuels to manufacture that it is still releasing carbon into the atmosphere 20 years later even if it's parked in a garage and never used. In fact a vegan who drives a normal car to work releases the same amount of carbon that a meat eater uses when riding a bike... if you are serious about reducing your impact go vegan if you can't do this then don't worry about anything else you are just throwing money away. Don't get me wrong I save money with having solar while the payback for my pocket is 5 years, the payback to the climate is 25 years and what's the point of spending money to save money if it doesn't matter I'll still kill the planet...
I A Reid
I A Reid 2 года назад
Mauro, all expensive pie in the sky ideas, If and maybe just is not good enough, renwable generation is but a small fraction of our requiremenmt and the times that their output exceeds demand is insufficient for all the batteries you can muster to make up the shortfall. And it's at a large cost.
Mauro Scimone
Mauro Scimone 2 года назад
Great system! Really smart and good video too! Thank you !
Curtis Florager
Curtis Florager 2 года назад
What happens when tourists come to visit Denmark in 2050 and cannot refuel their unconverted car because the country is 'independent' of fossil fuels? Surely they will still need to buy fossil fuels on some scale until the rest of the world can catch up.
watchthe1369
watchthe1369 2 года назад
sadoway.mit.edu/research/liquid-metal-batteries A way to stabilize the fluctuations? Check LFTR for a good baseload generator.
kawii Turtle
kawii Turtle 2 года назад
Denmark ....World leader in respect for life....find ways to guilt trip the usa who has an inertial and economically motivated resistance to clean energy transformation will. Thanks from the webmaster of the internet in Redding, California
moosefactory133
moosefactory133 2 года назад
After watching probably hundreds of videos on renewable energy, I am convinced there is no magic bullet. I think eventually (not in my lifetime) that a combination of different methods will be used for a completely sustainable energy future. This will involve geothermal, hydro, various types of solar technologies, wind, hydrogen and bio liquid fuels made from algae. Algae is carbon neutral because it removes the same amount of CO2 that it releases during burning through the process of photosynthesis during the time it is growing. But all this will not happen until the cost of oil and other fossil fuels reaches a point that is higher than the cost of producing green energy. But there again, I might be completely wrong on my assumptions.
Discover Beyond
Discover Beyond Год назад
Hey man you know that much so please do a change the world its collapsing now help all humans
Chris Gerwin
Chris Gerwin Год назад
If you are looking for a magic bullet to really make a difference in the global energy problem, look into generation four reactors (search molten salt reactors). However the only reasonable solution to our global energy shortage will be to use every and all types energy generation, storage and efficiency techniques.
Theodoяe Kяap
Theodoяe Kяap Год назад
The Russians were experimenting orbital mirrors in the early 90s to reflect sunlight onto solar power plants, increasing their energy production and eliminating their downtime during night. Unfortunately due to lack of funding and the fall of the USSR the experiment was halted then cancelled. It'd be cool if we have orbital mirrors generating electricity or warming up northern cities.
I A Reid
I A Reid Год назад
Joe, in your dreams, you cannot fight the physics. There is simply little energy in the green energy systems.
Jim Martin
Jim Martin 2 года назад
Biomass humans make a lot of feces do they not? There is your biomass!
Jim Martin
Jim Martin 2 года назад
A great use of Colaca cola.
mynoks
mynoks 2 года назад
Jim Martin actually in the video they mention sewage waters... so the plan is to use human shit too!
S. VC
S. VC 2 года назад
Just like in Spain that the State is shamelessly protecting the cartel of 5 big energy corporations by way of charging a special tax on the sun... That is to say, any residential individual interested in installing solar panels, which will be hooked to the national grid is being taxed to an extent such that the investment will not be payed off until well at the end of the equipment's useful life, thus becoming unfeasable. This in the country where the "sun shines" the most in Europe... And then people are surprised that Catalonia wants to become independent from incompetent, corrupt, evangelical and pre-modern ugly Spain.
321ozzy
321ozzy Месяц назад
+Paul McGreevy 1) Generate solar power and store it at your place instead of delivering it to the national grid. 2) You will be still connected to the grid in order to consume the electricity provided by the electricity company. I agree with your statements regarding and related the solar energy being dependent on the number of sun-hours.
Paul McGreevy
Paul McGreevy Месяц назад
321ozzy The greater metropolitan area of Tokyo has 36 million people what cost would the batteries be to support a city like this. What if there was bad weather for a few days or a week? On the second day the batteries would be drained and the city would grind to a halt. Solar power is intermittent and variable. You still have to have a conventional grid which would be running very inefficiently or you would have to have sufficient storage capacity
321ozzy
321ozzy Месяц назад
+Paul McGreevy That is why the solar panel users should store the energy in batteries and not send it back into the grid. A small fee for the maintenance cost of the grid is understandable. On the other hand, a lot of tax money goes to the fossil fuel maffia, I mean companies, because they are losing income... Reducing energy use on behalf of the population is also to be looked into, many ways to reduce without even having to sacrifice comfort.
Paul McGreevy
Paul McGreevy 8 месяцев назад
Same occurs in Hawaii and Nevada and other places. This is the problem. The companies that provide the grid and make everything work start to lose business when too many people get roof panels up to the point where they would have to go bankrupt. To stay in business they have to pay less for feed in power and make a bigger service charge to cover their cost. This is why solar can’t work. Solar farms don’t work either because you need 180 square miles of panels to match a 3Gw nuclear power station. The panels require extensive energy intensive mining to manufacture and they have to be repaired and replaced regularly. Imagine the land costs involved. Totally impractical. Wind requires 1,000 square miles for same energy production. The only thing renewable about these energy sources is the sun and the wind. Everything else needs manufacture and maintenance and repairs and regular replacement and lots of expensive land.
Jacob
Jacob Год назад
Man that sounds fucked up. I hope Catalonia will get a referendum soon.
Hai Bui
Hai Bui 2 года назад
Add những trạm năng lượng vào điện thoại của người sử dụng nó
Eclipse Now
Eclipse Now 2 года назад
Sadly, many groups quote Dr James Hansen on the problem of climate change, while ignoring his stated *solution*. He says: 1. Believing in 100% RENEWABLES is like believing in the Easter Bunny or Tooth Fairy. (Yes, he's aware of all the 'studies' that say we can, but still thinks storage is ridiculously expensive and cannot do the job). goo.gl/8qidgV 2. The world should build 115 reactors a year* goo.gl/Xx61xU (*Note: on a reactors-to-GDP ratio the French *already* beat this build rate back in the 70's under the Mesmer plan. 115 reactors a year should be easy for the world economy. France did it *faster* with older technology, and today's nukes can be mass produced on an assembly line. Also, GenIV breeders are coming that can eat nuclear waste and covert a 100,000 year storage problem into 1000 years of clean energy for America and 500 years for the UK with today's levels of nuclear waste).
Stanley Cyprien
Stanley Cyprien 2 года назад
This renewable energy technology is suitable for a cold climate environment.
Roger Reimer
Roger Reimer Год назад
Roger Reimer 1 second ago No such thing as renewable energy it takes 240.000 tons of C02 to build a 3 million dollar wind mill because of all the coal you have to burn to make the 32,000 tons of cement 12,000 tons of re-bar for an 80 meter wind turbine plus all the coal needed to make the steel transmission and bearings plus the oil needed to make the carbon propeller. Then all the lubricant for the $250,000 transmission and bearings which may last 10 or 15 year at most. The new cement wind mill may last 35 or more years over water a lot less. At the end of 35 year the decommissioning of the bird killer may take as much C02 as the construction. One massive farm is now being decommissioned in Alberta the cost and the dangers are very high.
2Awesome
2Awesome 2 года назад
The only way to convert heat into electricity is to have a cold place to move that heat to.
Suburban Slingshots
Suburban Slingshots 2 года назад
+Citizen052 maybe a way to harness heat or humidity in a tropical or arid region? Converting heat energy into electrical energy
Citizen052
Citizen052 2 года назад
Yes, i would like to conceptualise such a system for a tropical climate
Stanley Cyprien
Stanley Cyprien 2 года назад
I'm his exterminator i like this system except for the ideal of using wood. Fascinating.
2Awesome
2Awesome 2 года назад
+Damor Vaibhav there is a net loss of CO2 emissions. When tree grows: CO2 -> O2 + sugars When you burn tree: O2 + sugars -> CO2 As long as you burn less than what grows, atmospheric CO2 levels go down.
Damor Vaibhav
Damor Vaibhav 2 года назад
CO2 emission?? also watch "Before the flood"
2Awesome
2Awesome 2 года назад
What is wrong with using wood as long as you grow more than you burn? In USA/Canada, they grow more trees then they chop down.
Samantha Darwin
Samantha Darwin 2 года назад
Having sustainable energy sources wont just save us from losing all our natural resources it also save us from our monthly bills..
G Philip C
G Philip C 2 года назад
How about the use of bananas for energy?
G Philip C
G Philip C 2 года назад
+psound sytem ~ Sorry, you FAIL...I AM funny...no getting around it. Bananas grow very quickly...if we are going to use Corn to make ethanol...why not Bananas?
manu ochenta
manu ochenta 2 года назад
You can make biodiesel to power a plant so your atempt to bein funny fail.
Greg Grady
Greg Grady 2 года назад
I propose reducing global consumers. How about we start with 1/3 of the world population. we can have a court determine who the most valuable people are and then recycle into a fuel source, it's biomass.
cadkls
cadkls Месяц назад
+The Ultimate Reductionist "force new humans into the world" Well looks like we have found the source of your evil. You hate yourself and your existence so you wish death on others. What a vile creature you are.
Robin Gilliver
Robin Gilliver 2 месяца назад
+The Ultimate Reductionist Conservatives are atheist, retard.
Robin Gilliver
Robin Gilliver 2 месяца назад
That is evil.
The Ultimate Reductionist
The Ultimate Reductionist 2 года назад
+Greg Grady Yes! Agreed. Let's start by killing and recycling christians, conservatives, muslims, Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) deniers, pronatalists who think they are entitled to breed and breed and breed and overpopulate and force new humans into this world without their permission, bankers, stock traders, anyone with a job on Wall Street. The homeless and prisoners consume and burn the LEAST amount of energy.
LongTimeAtheist
LongTimeAtheist 2 года назад
Yea, and who's court do you propose to use? ISIS's, the US, Russian, Chinese or others? Remember you and your children would have to go in front of that court... Although Fat people would be a goof fuel supply... Oh wait I need to hurry up and go on a diet. Wait I will donate the liposuction fat. Awesome! Fuel my video game and loose some weight! I propose we just figure out how to use 1/3 less energy.
jeric cordero
jeric cordero 2 года назад
personally I love green energy resources, I admired Danish Government for caring people and for the saved of natures, my government which is opposite they care only for themselves how earned money and power greedy selfishness, I wish i could be a Danish..
jeric cordero
jeric cordero 2 года назад
+ajdiddie Philippines
ajdiddie
ajdiddie 2 года назад
Do you mean the us government
Copi !
Copi ! 2 года назад
Kjør på! Dette gir meg håp for fremtiden! :D
Bipin Karki
Bipin Karki 2 года назад
Really cool technologies for replacing fossil based fuel. But they might be too costly in country like Nepal to implement with geographical difficulty. But there is great surge of solar panel in Nepal too,
mrotola28
mrotola28 2 года назад
ive seen a guy that has a catalist to cut energy consumption for electrolysis by 2/3rds at this rate i think the most universal free energy scorce is hydrogen.
LongTimeAtheist
LongTimeAtheist 2 года назад
+Bradley Huffstetler No, it is considered quite a bit. The difference is that it is easier to clean up a handful of smoke stacks than it is to clean up millions of tailpipes. Many power plants are moving to Natural gas. You have the solar and wind options. Where I live in the Northwet we have loads of hydro. Power walls for homes are being considered to lower the need for peak load power needs. Coal, oil and natural gas plants are used most often for peak load conditions because they are faster to turn on. So if you add a buffer you can better manage your base load. Fuel delivery to a single power plant and propagation of that energy out to homes via wires is cheaper and more efficient than delivering the fuel to your local gas stations. If you didnt have to deliver to the local gas station you would also lower congestion on the roads. The amount of electricity to manufacture a gallon of gasoline in electricity could conceivably power an electric car for about 60 miles... One caveat though. Most of that energy is heat to crack the oil to make gasoline so that energy doesnt directly transfer there are energy losses to convert to electricity. Physics getting in the way again. I happen to be very close to someone who works for a electric company. There is a lot of work being done to reduce the need for peak load power generation. At least this power company seems to be concerned about its public perception and really tries to do the right thing. Like so many companies they dont always get it right but I would say they really try. Something else more important than efficiency in some ways to me at least. If you believe in the capitalist system you should have choices and be able to vote with your pocket book. I have a Prius and Leaf. This means I have Cut my Koch Brothers taxes by 2/3. I send 2/3 less money to the middle east dictatorships. In the Northwet I keep most of my energy money right here in the Northwet.
Bradley Huffstetler
Bradley Huffstetler 2 года назад
So many good points in one reply.. I, like probably many people who read about this stuff, have never stopped to think about the energy to produce the gasoline/diesel itself. Completely negates the argument of "where do you think that electricity in your electric car comes from?"
LongTimeAtheist
LongTimeAtheist 2 года назад
Sadly Hydrogen gas is not an energy source. A popular miss conception. At best it is a poor storage medium. It takes a huge amount of energy to split water into Hydrogen and Oxygen. You can use natural gas as a Hydrogen source it still takes a lot of energy to extract the hydrogen. Then to store / effectively transport Hydrogen it takes more energy to compress it to somewhere around 10,000 PSI. Now you can burn Hydrogen in a Internal Combustion Engine which is at best 20% efficient. The other method is Fuel cell vehicle. The fuel Cell vehicle converts the compressed Hydrogen to electricity and stores that electricity in a battery which drives an electric motor. A good reference artical with more data. electrek.co/2016/04/26/automakers-fuel-cell-hydrogen-electric-vehicles/ So after all those conversions the physics of hydrogen just does not work out. Unless you can store the energy from the explosion of a hydrogen bomb. Also known as Nuclear fusion. We are working on that. Not there yet. It is far more efficient to store the electricity into a battery from your electric company then drive an electric motor. Strangely enough it takes about 6 KW to refine 1 gallon of gasoline. A Nisan leaf's battery pack can hold 24 KW and gets around 96 miles. Thats about 24 miles per 6KW or 24 miles that you could get by not refining that gallon of gas. Thats only the refining cost. Dont forget the energy that it took to pump it out of the ground, Ship it from there it was pumped and shipping it from the refinery to your gas station. Now there is the argument that coal is used to charge the electric car. They forget to tell you that coal is used to refine that gallon of gasoline. (That is a net / net) Gasoline has the additional pollution of Oil / coal is used to pump the oil out of the ground, shipping it around the world. Then finally the exhaust that comes out of the tail pipe. Electricity doesnt need to be shipped via vehicles. It is shipped via pollution free wires. I hope this helps to understand the really big picture of energy. Physics always tend to get in the way.
Israel Ortiz
Israel Ortiz 2 года назад
Very interesting. But the problem with wind turbine is that it will not produce energy 24/7. But there is a way to produce more energy 24/7 using this power source: ruvid.net/video/видео-HkNqtdzgdYU.html
Ryan Dyjur
Ryan Dyjur 2 года назад
did u watch the video ? because they definitely adressed this problem with wave energy, green gas, biomass etc....
Amazon Books
Amazon Books 2 года назад
Renewable Energy eBook www.amazon.com/dp/B009ZK1UBE
Mattia Francesco Bruni
Mattia Francesco Bruni 2 года назад
57 nuclear accidents since 1986, averaging out to just over two nuclear accidents each year. 4,000 fatalities in the Chernobyl disaster. 600,000 people still suffering from the effects of Chernobyl. 8,015 overall deaths from the Kytshym disaster. 35 deaths from the Windscale fire. 181 other deaths from accidents in nuclear plants around the world. Nuclear explosions can permanently damage DNA. In 2011, 15 years after the Chernobyl disaster, wolf carcasses were tested for radiation and revealed that the wolves had extremely high levels of radiation. So high that they shouldn’t have been touched with bare human hands. Birth defects in wolves around Chernobyl have nearly doubled since 1986. The waste from nuclear power plants will be toxic to humans for 100,000 years after it is released. There are at least eight relatively easy ways to cause a nuclear meltdown. This is an easy act of terrorism. Living near a nuclear plant can increase the risk of childhood leukemia and other forms of cancer even if there is no meltdown. There are not enough sites safe from earthquakes, tsunamis, and other natural disasters to operate safe nuclear power plants. Even if there were enough feasible sites for nuclear plants, our uranium would be depleted in less than ten years. www.debate.org/opinions/is-nuclear-power-bad-for-the-environment
Mattia Francesco Bruni
Mattia Francesco Bruni 2 года назад
?? are you kidding me? You defend nuclear, I make my point against, we talk about and now you say I am for nuclear? I cannot understood you
Mattia Francesco Bruni
Mattia Francesco Bruni 2 года назад
I agree, indeed it's a shame the fact that coal are still in use. Also because radioactive isotopes are also emitted by coal powerplant and mercury too
Mattia Francesco Bruni
Mattia Francesco Bruni 2 года назад
I don't get it. what do you mean? we are talking about DNA-radioactive metals interaction I don't see how this " international power agency" can get involved
Mattia Francesco Bruni
Mattia Francesco Bruni 2 года назад
I say google scholar, and if you need also the query search for "radioactive isotope dna interaction" or if interested in PubMed search for "chernobyl child diseases". I hope they teach you also how to use sci-hub. Anyway, nuclear waste didn't cause death but cancer which is bad I personally believe
Mattia Francesco Bruni
Mattia Francesco Bruni 2 года назад
ok, for get informed about nuclear waste this can be a starting point www.psr.org/resources/nuclear-power-factsheet.html?referrer=www.google.it/ sorry if my previous comments seems uneducate
Mattia Francesco Bruni
Mattia Francesco Bruni 2 года назад
www.psr.org/resources/nuclear-power-factsheet.html?referrer=www.google.it/
grumpystiltskin
grumpystiltskin 2 года назад
Nuclear power suddenly doesn't seem so scary anymore... James Hansen really got me thinking. ruvid.net/video/видео-JP-cRqCQRc8.html It looks like the year of Max CO2 needs to be 2020. Wind and solar alone aren't going to do that. Big Oil and Coal have managed to suppress nuclear by making people think it is unsafe, despite the fact that it saved 1.8 million lives that would otherwise have been lost to air pollution. Air pollution from fossil fuels is what causes heart disease, lung cancer, a lot of diabetes and Alzheimer's, not to mention asthma. Nuclear power frees us of most of that. We could have saved 140,000,000 people if we had rolled out Nuclear the way Eisenhour and JFK planned. But it is not too late. The Seeborg commission showed how. Nuclear plants from companies like ThorConPower or Terrestrial Energy can be cranked out by ship yards, many gigawatts per month. We can get ahead of climate collapse. Hansen knows and speaks about 3rd and 4th generation nuclear power. (Actually it is the MSR tech of 1953 we need!) But the downside Hansen shows is scary. He is claiming (and you have to listen carefully) that there is a good chance of 3 feet of sea level rise in 50 year. But that's not the bad news... 10 years later, it will be 10 feet. So our best team of climatologists are telling us that in 2076, the 300th anniversary of the USA, all our historic coastal cities will actually be history. Wiped out. But that's STILL not the bad news... Sandy wasn't a super-storm. But they're coming.
MrTiti
MrTiti 2 года назад
Sorry it is not a good way to out an opinion. There is no prove at all about the facts of Alzheimer and the fact about diabetis is just nonsense. how in hell can CO2 or particles cause diabetes? we dont even have a prove the deodorant alu causes chest aor breast cancer. Janes Hansen probably can brainwash uneducated, but if you get a high grade at uni and work scientificially, you would condemn your statement
stevenlevymath
stevenlevymath 2 года назад
Pie charts on power generation. They are animated. ruvid.net/video/видео-jRvlPFHhcjw.html
TheyCalledMeT
TheyCalledMeT 3 года назад
no idea .. if the math is realistic but its by far the most thought trough solution i've seen .. yet. (even if i have to add a .. sadly)
Matthew LaRoche
Matthew LaRoche 3 года назад
Hi, please let me take a moment to say a word about thorium fission, for him is a nuclear energy source that was first developed at the Oak Ridge national laboratory in the 1960s and is a completely safe non-carbon producing non-nuclear waste producing Energy source with in estimated easily obtainable natural reserve of 10,000 years, Let me repeat it again, there is enough thorium ore lying around to last the entire world economy 10,000 years. The molten salt thorium fission process, Furthermore is operated at one atmosphere, So when I say molten salt thorium fission is completely safe That is to say get is not capable of exploding, As pressure on both sides of the reactor containment wall are the same. Thorium fission is also as stated in incredibly clean producing no long-lasting nuclear waste whatsoever, in fact waste plutonium 232 from Standard light water reactors and atomic bombs can be incorporated into the molten salt Core and the remains of its potential energy can be extracted, furthermore with close to a 75% efficiency Capture oppose to the .7% of the standard light water reactor we can afford to not only make this a Carbon neutral but a carbon negative virtually closed loop energy system. Thorium fission beads out nearly every other conceivable energy source except for Fusion which as always is 50 years away from possible viability. So in other words we could in a cost efficient manner using the well-known, Haber-Bosch, Process extract carbon out of the atmosphere. Let me finally just say, that most of the wars being fought in the middle east and Central Asia, can be regarded in general, as resource wars, a massive transfer to a thorium based economy would not only make everyone Energy independent overnight but would help to obfuscate the need for such self-destructive behavior. Thank you for taking the time to read this and please feel free to research any of this that you care to, peace.
Razvan Florin
Razvan Florin 3 года назад
THE SYSTEM IS VERY COMPLEX AND COMPLICATED... IT WILL BREAK DOWN. WHY NOT NUCLEAR POWER? MSR (MOLTEN SALT REACTOR) SYSTEM (THORIUM REACTOR)?
Ashley Zinyk
Ashley Zinyk 3 года назад
The goal should not be to use less energy, it should be to emit less CO2. When the wind blows and the sun shines, energy use will have to increase, not decrease. I fear that Denmark is optimizing to the wrong solution because they're trying to solve the wrong problem.
Ashley Zinyk
Ashley Zinyk Год назад
Energy use is the wrong thing to measure. Is it better to use 1 kWh and emit 200 grams of CO2, or use 2 kWh and emit 30 grams of CO2? Clearly the second one is better, because it's CO2 that threatens the environment, not the amount of energy used. Also, efficiency can counter-intuitively make consumption increase, because of Jevons Paradox.
Jacob
Jacob Год назад
Why not use less energy when it is easily done? Better insulation in homes, LED lights, fuel efficient cars and so on.
NuklearAusstiegJetzt
NuklearAusstiegJetzt 3 года назад
+Ashley Zinyk This model is local but too little decentralized. I miss in the local energy supply the private and public share on solar roofs.
Ronald Mcarther
Ronald Mcarther 3 года назад
FUCK DENMARK i hate your socialist AKA communist country.
Jacob
Jacob Год назад
Denmark isn't communist though.
Ashton Elliott
Ashton Elliott 3 года назад
+Adam Chester nuclear fission was invented in Canada. Nuclear fission takes up a lot of your energy output. Including submarines, aircraft carriers, other ships. And everything else that needs to be supplied with nuclear plants (not everywhere but more often than not nuclear fission is there)
Ashton Elliott
Ashton Elliott 3 года назад
+Adam Chester WTF does this have anything to do with what I said "retard"
Ronald Mcarther
Ronald Mcarther 3 года назад
+Ashton Elliott Wind energy was invented by AMERICANS you retard.
Ashton Elliott
Ashton Elliott 3 года назад
You obviously don't realize how good it is. If your country (where ever the fuck you live) was able to implement this they would. Btw I'm Canadian so don't think I'm like "ya were Denmark were so cool" because I'm not. Also if your American... Hahahahahahahahahahaha
Hyperkronos
Hyperkronos 3 года назад
Danes confirmed for masterrace.
Zeljko Serdar
Zeljko Serdar 3 года назад
Official Croatian government, can you dig it ? ruvid.net/video/видео-eiBiB4DaYOM.html
Zeljko Serdar
Zeljko Serdar 3 года назад
The scientific community agrees on a crucial fact: we must leave most remaining fossil fuels in the ground, or our children and future generations are screwed.
Mr. Niceguy
Mr. Niceguy 3 года назад
2:36 I disagree with them. Sure renewable energy fluctuates over time, but only integration is not enough to solve this problem. Specially at night that is common to have not wind neither wave movements beyond the obvious lack of solar light (in despite their midnight sun) as I believe some weather expert would better explain. Even during a day, the sunlight may not be enough to activate the solar panels, because there is an operational range I think there is a connection between the clouds that would block sun beams and the winds I mean the warmming soil process generate winds.
Marcelo Jiménez
Marcelo Jiménez 3 года назад
+brazilianniceguy Deep Cycle Batteries could solve the lack of energy at nights. About the required energy to activate a solar cell, there is radiaton data and models that allow us to calculate how much energy we would be able to produce basing on the weather of the geographical location and the type of cell, so the ammount of energy it's a known fact when it comes to installing solar panels.- (I don't speak english very well but it's understable)
Joshua Le Marchant
Joshua Le Marchant 3 года назад
is mayonaise an instrument?
undead890
undead890 2 года назад
Horse Radish isn't an instrument either.
The Ultimate Reductionist
The Ultimate Reductionist 2 года назад
Mayonaise is Satan's condiment.
Scott Sound
Scott Sound 3 года назад
lol
Andy Casbo
Andy Casbo 3 года назад
wast of time and resources, we need helium 3 power reactor
Mark Smed
Mark Smed 3 года назад
Biomass and wind are jokes. We need nuclear, now more than ever.
Carl Taylor
Carl Taylor 11 месяцев назад
Mark - You are way behind the times and either ill-informed or just short-sighted.
Dand AinTac
Dand AinTac Год назад
I think with regards to nuclear, people remember Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima. I agree with Mark that nuclear can be part of the mix, and indeed a source of power that is not dependent on the uncertainties of weather is needed. What people don't realize is that there are new nuclear reactor designs that are far, far safer and more efficient than the old designs that gave us disasters like Chernobyl. The French rely very heavily on nuclear power, and I don't think they have ever had an accident. If done RIGHT, nuclear can and probably should be part of the mix. I think we will be using Natural Gas for a long time too, and I also see huge potential for Geothermal--there is a vast amount of heat in the Earth's interior--enough to power all our needs for thousands of years. Wind and solar are probably not going to be enough for our huge energy needs, although I believe they will play a big part--much bigger than skeptics believe--but those two technologies will NOT be enough by themselves.
Mark Smed
Mark Smed Год назад
Reprocess it, reuse the uranium and plutonium and vitrify the fission products. The reused part of the fuel will be used in fast reactors. This waste is then disposed of in deep boreholes (Essentially the same technology as with oil wells, perhaps a little wider. The vitrified waste is glasslike and will stay intact for thousands of years. At the bottom of the sealed borehole it will be able to be safely stored for thousands of years.
Ivan Drago
Ivan Drago Год назад
Mark Smed what do you do with the waste nuclear?
sahlool
sahlool 2 года назад
The Ultimate Reductionist true, I think also we should outlaw the breeding and murdering of crops. we have to find a human way to get our food
Vanja Hadzic
Vanja Hadzic 3 года назад
Published on Nov 28, 2014 Get more info here about the research conducted in the Sustainable Energy Planning Group at Aalborg University: www.EnergyPLAN.eu ----------------------------------------­----------------------------------------­----------------------------------------­----------------------------------------­---------------- Smart Energy Systems: 100% Renewable Energy at a National Level (Full Version) Denmark has decided to become independent from fossil fuels. For the sake of the climate, the economy, and in order to ensure security of energy supply. This film shows how this will happen based on research conducted at Aalborg University (www.smartenergysystems.eu). At present wind and solar energy already delivers a good share of Denmark's energy, but renewable energy is a major challenge for an energy system that is built upon fossil fuels. Energy production from wind and solar fluctuates - it fluctuates as the wind blows. So what renewables are reliable when there is no sun or wind energy available? Another challenge is the transport sector. How do we create an energy system of renewable energy, where also cars, ships and planes can operate on fossil-free energy? A great example of an energy system that will ensure Denmark a 100% renewable energy system is called: Smart Energy Systems - a coherent, fossil-free energy system that will create lots of new jobs and green energy for the Danes, both in terms of electricity, heat and transport. Production courtesy of: www.webwall.tv/blueplanetinnov... www.blueplanetinnovation.dk Category Science & Technology License Standard RUvid License
Следующие видео
Top 10 Energy Sources of the Future
13:12
Просмотров 1 800 000
Micro Tesla Turbine Mk2 | Part 1 | The Rotor
15:45
Просмотров 2 100 000
How Hong Kong Changed Countries
11:51
Просмотров 797 863
A reality check on renewables - David MacKay
18:35
The Fuel Tank of Tomorrow - A Super Capacitor?
10:02
Why China Is so Good at Building Railways
12:13
Просмотров 3 000 000
Can We Terraform the Sahara to Stop Climate Change?
12:48
SuperMagnetMan - Fundamentals of Halbach Arrays
11:34
How Far Away Is It - 10 - The Milky Way (1080p)
20:00
Depth Control - Bokeh’d - Apple
0:39
Просмотров 19 093 345
Samsung Galaxy S10 OFFICIAL TRAILER!
3:47
Просмотров 942 892
Galaxy Unpacked 2019 live stream
2:22:32
Просмотров 3 013 727
What we just went through
18:50
Просмотров 106 883
MYSTERY GIFT FROM THE DARK-WEB
33:14
Просмотров 135 382