Dark

One Simple Trick to get 100 miles per gallon with less pollution!

Zeek on Earth
Subscribe
Views 608 073
82% 4 658 979

I take the time to educate you on some simple concepts regarding fuel consumption and pollution. Then I give you the concept behind my invention that is capable of producing the results titled and discussed.
Canadian Patent #: 2,876,642

Science & Technology

Published on

 

Mar 28, 2017

Share:

Link:

Download:

Loading link...

Add to:

My playlist
Watch later
Comments 1 502
Matt
Matt 2 days ago
so where is the "simple trick"?
Buck Naked
Buck Naked 4 days ago
Liquid gas is not what goes into the cylinder, that's a flooding out situation, it atomizes in the airflow to the cylinder when adjusted properly
jmoujm
jmoujm 15 days ago
Nice I would like to know more about your research
Arewe Done
Arewe Done 16 days ago
(1) Google Butter ball turkey plant (crude oil in 20 mintes). (2) That exhaust doesn't remain suspended indefinitely.(3) In 1984 Hot Rod Magazine published an homogenized system that turbo charged hot vaporized air fuel mix. 1.8 horse per cubic in. Smokey did that, patented it, Chrysler bought it, shelved it and here we are. Google it.
Jose Manolo Zaragoza
1st of all gasoline coming from crude oil is NOT a fossil fuel. It is hydrocarbon based which is hydrogen and carbon. It is abundant in the mantle of the earth and it is produced naturally by the earth..Just imagine if north america consumes 400 million gallons of gasoline everyday how many fossils would it take to produce that amount? And how many decades did we started consuming that amount?
Joe Vignolo
Joe Vignolo 29 days ago
So how does the pre-mixer maintain an adequate rate of combustible vapor flowing into the engine at all different engine loads and speeds? And how is an accurate air/fuel mixture maintained at all engine loads and speeds? And how do you prevent the pre-mixer and induction system from exploding if a misfire occurs and sends a flame backwards into the pre-mixer?
Harley Canine
Harley Canine Month ago
First of all, you didn't explain the simple trick. Yes, I get it, it involves somehow changing the liquid into a gas BEFORE it enters the combustion chamber, but.....you never explained how you actually DO that. Probably because you don't want to give that away huh? Secondly, the oil companies, along with government, don't want us to burn less gas. Yours is not the first technology to come along to allow cars to get 100 mpg. Those technologies were squashed. I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to figure out who squashed them.
kentbarger
kentbarger Month ago
Vaporizing the fuel heating it up and vaporizing the fuel so it is more efficient you can also use meter hydrogen also it is called a hydrogen generator
kentbarger
kentbarger Month ago
Also use a oversized radiator to help keep the engine cooler because the engineer will be running hotter you need a bigger radiator to help keep it regulated at the right temperature
kentbarger
kentbarger Month ago
Use sodium valves and steel Elway Pistons and the high quality piston rings that you use for the steel alloy Pistons sodium valves will withstand 1600 degree Heat
kentbarger
kentbarger Month ago
If you can preheat the fuel and injected into the motor where the gas does not cool down and it is vaporized you will get very excellent mileage
kentbarger
kentbarger Month ago
My grandfather taught me to how to modify carburetors for mileage he was a head mechanic for a Ford dealership back in the 60s I had a 65 Ford Galaxie 4 door 2 barrel carburetor 289 the motor was old I got 90 up to 120 on the compression pull a 5 by 8 trailer with a hundred pounds on the vehicle and I got 23 and a half miles to the gallon going through Wyoming on Flatlands I got 28 miles to the gallon grandfather taught me how to modify carburetors for mileage I can also modify the Holley carburetors and boards and Carter carburetors Rochester carburetors I like the Fords and Holley carburetors the best for modification for gas mileage
kentbarger
kentbarger Month ago
I have a 65 Ford Galaxie I modified the two barrel carburetor I had a 289 V-8 2 Barrel Ford carburetor new motor would have had 160 lb compression the old car I had had 90 up to 120 lb compression pull a 5 by 8 trailer was about 100 pounds on the hitch old motor got 23 and a half miles to the gallon this was a four-door Ford Galaxie I modified the carburetor if I would had the car only without the trailer I am estimating at least 28 miles to the gallon my grandfather was a head mechanic at the Ford dealership back in the early 60s and he taught me how to modify carburetors for gas mileage
elruforafa
elruforafa Month ago
Is it not the same reason some people turn to natural gas instead of transforming their gasoline in gas using your method? Gas is a clean emission fuel.
emilee
emilee Month ago
Correction!!! it does NOT take millions or billions of years to create crude oil. in labs can be made in less than 2 hours , STOP believing the Biggest LIE EVER told!!!!
leroy umland
leroy umland Month ago
Vapor
leroy umland
leroy umland Month ago
yes run propane fuel it run better and cooler to and engine run cleaner
Alfred Schembri
Alfred Schembri Month ago
Oil is not a fossil fuel and is not going to run out and they say it's running out so that they can put up the price. These mongrels are cutting their own throat by encouraging the development of electric vehicle. In a few years these mongrels will stick their petrol up their arse.
Sea Hawks
Sea Hawks Month ago
Alfred, you are correct sir! they are all money whores, it's funny you used the word mongrels to discribe them, it fits very well if they are pushing for electric cars because the word mongrel means "Hybrid" good one! but by then it won't matter, they own the coal that fuels the turbines that generates the electricity to charge the (acid & lead) batteries in the electric cars, so much for less pollution using electric cars.... but the Paris accord would have you believe so, not to mention we need to invest every dollar we have into global warming....and it all starts with building many more electric cars!
0-Zone
0-Zone Month ago
It's a gas bubbler, plain and simple.
Cliver McGyver
Cliver McGyver Month ago
II think he could have done a better explanation to what causes the saving. I am a fan of Indy races and we fans know that on a day of high humidity and or a little rain the cars have a real gain in power as the moisture causes the gas to fracture with a good separation the combustion burns more atoms of fuel. back in the 60s' we put spark plugs in the tail pipe and watch the rocket.... lol
Randy Mcgrew
Randy Mcgrew Month ago
I discovered how to bring are underneath gasoline in a container in 1999 hook it to a Briggs & Stratton 18 horse engine it started easier it had more power and hardly any fumes smell out the exhaust at all oh I did was hook a hose to the top of the carburetor with no fuel in the carburetor ran it to the top of a can ran a hose from the top of the can to the bottom half inch off bottom when the carburetor drawled it pulled the air from the hose on the bottom up through the gasoline and then to the engine it worked perfect
Warren McCarty
Warren McCarty Month ago
What you need there is a how to mix air and gasoline and injected into your combustion chamber until you get that please stop talking
Leonay Carballo
Leonay Carballo Month ago
What about the problem that the mechanic say that happen if an engine is burning too little gas that make them overheating and running dry?
Sulema Velazquez
this is in brazil they are very long time with this ruvid.net/video/video-F8YXLsDg4ew.html
Dave Exline
Dave Exline Month ago
THINK YOU WOULD BE BACK AT THE PROBLEM OF RUNNING LEAN, THE AMOUNT OF YOUR NEW GAS YOU WOULD HAVE TO INTRODUCE TO THE CYLINDER WOULD BE EQUIVALENT TO THE LIQUID FORM. ALSO WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO EXPAND THE USE OF FOSSIL FUEL?
Jose Lopez
Jose Lopez Month ago
I fart into my tank and get 150 mpg
Chris Longski
Chris Longski Month ago
Not possible unless the rules of stoichiometry (combustion science) have been repealed...
Cedric Proper
Cedric Proper Month ago
I just finished reading the patent. patents.google.com/patent/CA2876642A1/en It might be possible to significantly reduce fuel consumption with a device like this one, however I would not recommend cooking food with gasoline.
Tim Cortner
Tim Cortner Month ago
Have have bad news for you oil is not a facile fuel. They now are pulling oil out deeper than time frame from dinosaurs. It is now known that they called it a facile fuel so they can charge more because it may run out. Oil to earth is like blood in your body.
Catalin Petrea
Catalin Petrea Month ago
Why then US gov killed the two inventors of vaporizer in 1960? Shell bought the invention for $1 million bucks and buried that project. There is no modern car today having that much fuel economy like those prototypes cars back in '60. To solve pollution is simple, burn alive those mother sookers paedophile satanist govs in every country and problems will vanish... of course before they finish to exterminate us.
edward toner
edward toner 2 months ago
Heat makes the different . This is Bull shite
robert lewis
robert lewis 2 months ago
Some folks like there engine to make it over 30,000 miles..
Victor Hettinger
Victor Hettinger 2 months ago
I thnk ur great. Thanks for sharing
Peter Roberts
Peter Roberts 2 months ago
Another comparison: How many remember the "Pump-It-Up-till-Pressured" type paraffin/kerosene stoves sold years ago?. The LIQUID is pressurized by hand held mini piston/one way valve. the LIQUID squeezes up through two U-shaped tubes ABOVE the small bowl where flames are formed.Then get vaporized/heated by the tubes,come out to of the "burner holes" underneath. Had to be PRIMED at first with "meth-spirit",set alight before using the kerosene. After 2 minutes,start the pressure buildup.........Kerosene heated,gas,burns,sustains the heating of following kerosene......
Peter Roberts
Peter Roberts 2 months ago
First 11 minutes describe known technilogy and standard methods of fuel delivery to a a (petrol) engine. Then starts the "make it a gas by heating it" idea. Google "Pogue" to see.
mr. nobody
mr. nobody 2 months ago
Smokey Yunick did that back in the early 90's on a 283 Chev by profection of the old 200mph carb... Gas has define stages (5) of flash points... He provided waste heat to the gas in stages of the flashing - the process of the 200mph carb was literally limited do to the fact that it didn't work with the chemical flash point of fuel and it's weakest design flaw - expending mixture. So when Smokey provided the heat for the 5 stages and used a compressor to pressurize that mixture into each cylinder - the engine made HP and MPG unlike anything before or now This info should help rexresearch.com/yunick/4862859.htm www.allpar.com/old/200-mpg-carburetor.html Watch this boomtastic.com/gallery/videos/Smokey-Yunick/Horsepower-TV/ I know he had a 283 build up - Car Craft I believe... Here a little more info rexresearch.com/yunick/yunick.htm
Don Hunt
Don Hunt 2 months ago
The auto companies and the oil companies have always been in bed with each other just as your insurance company and your health care have always been in bed to steal your money also
George Meade
George Meade 2 months ago
They did this back in 30 s
George Meade
George Meade 2 months ago
NOx will happen if the air gets over 2500 that's why we have to cool and cat to burn this.
DD More
DD More 2 months ago
Would like to know more. I've spent time and funds and researched the hydrogen cell to assist gasoline. I also know you're correct about your gas concept. I would like to talk to you regarding my input yo ur concept and design.
Dave Briscoe
Dave Briscoe 2 months ago
Ok’ So what’s the punch line.
Casey Shelton
Casey Shelton 2 months ago
Ultrasonic vaporizer. I did this years ago.
Casey Angeletti
Casey Angeletti 2 months ago
In order to produce a mass of 6 tons you would need to start with at least that amount. That equates to burning 5 gallons of gas per day 365 days a year, not far fetched for some but not most. Then the 6 tons of gas would have to be somehow by magic converted into 6 tons of carbon. Now that's actual carbon not co2. So if 18 lbs of co2 gas are created by combusting 6.5 lbs of gasoline then the actual carbon content of the co2 gas is less than a gram. so going buy your bs figure of 6 tons we would need to burn several hundreds of gallons of gasoline per day per vehicle. I'm not aboot to start drinking your koolaide. You sound like the idiot farmer Al Gore.
Casey Angeletti
Casey Angeletti 2 months ago
Besides that Gasoline is a byproduct of kerosene diesel production. So where does all that kerosene fit in your master plan?
fm00078
fm00078 2 months ago
I got 100 MPG... secretly added another equal sized fuel tank.
Roy B
Roy B 2 months ago
patents.google.com/patent/CA2876642A1/en Don't understand why he just didn't put this link up in the first place.
tom parankewich
tom parankewich 2 months ago
We have free energy the Govt does not to loose tax money
Robert Herman
Robert Herman 2 months ago
AND i thought fuel injection was around way before the 1970s
Slick1G3
Slick1G3 2 months ago
call it what it is HYDROGEN !!!!!!!
Patricia Scammell
Patricia Scammell 2 months ago
OMG, where did you guys go to school???? The only smart comment here is from 'Seqmicheal' a former former automotive (car) designer, who knows exactly that this guy is right. He already HAS a patent on his stuff and doesn't need to proof to you all, that his gadget works. It was already reviewed by the engineers of the patent office. He only wants to get someone to bankroll his great idea, not convince you guys that it works - it obviously does work. And a fuel is everything that burns efficient. A fossil fuel is comprised of ancient formerly organic (fossil) matter, go to school again! This is not click bait, it's a legitimate sales pitch (not everything is DIY on RUvid,) The 'proof of concept' is at the patent office in Canada. Great job, smart Canadian!!! (From a smart German who knows about cars.)
Jes Salvo
Jes Salvo 2 months ago
WTF
Neetz R
Neetz R 2 months ago
Somebody tell AOC its ok. The world doesnt have to end in 12 years. Tell her to put on some coveralls and get to mechanicin.
Steve Mably
Steve Mably 2 months ago
So the million dollar question is how do I convert my F 150 !!
Lois Cashner
Lois Cashner 2 months ago
Show me how I want to do it
Dr. David Goldstein
Dr. David Goldstein 2 months ago
Hi, you're an idiot. Fix your click bait title and quit wasting everyone's time trying to show the viewers you misled how smart you are. You're full of shit...
Michael Kelly
Michael Kelly 2 months ago
Oil is not a Fossil fuel !!! It is abiotic...not biotic... understand????
Brad Bjornson
Brad Bjornson 2 months ago
Best thing about fuel injection is that it stopped that annoying run on !
TheBloodcleaner
TheBloodcleaner 2 months ago
hasnt this guy heard of the pogue carburettor , they used this method in WW2 running tanks at 100miles per galon ( i said a tank) the government is owned by the fuel and pharma companies ...imagine how much money they have made since WW2 ...they are telling car makers how to build their engines ...20 years has passed since i got my licence cars have androids , variable controlled cam timing , multi point fuel injection, quad camshafts and the fuel consumtion hasnt changed on the vehicles !!!! WAKE UP tesla built an electric car in 1902 that pulled 90 miles an hour powered by a shoebox sized power source that didnt run flat...the army and fuel companies have all the technologies...
William Mason
William Mason 2 months ago
A while back VW got busted cheating on emissions. They had made their cars act one way when it was plugged in for testing and yet another when it was just driving down the road. That way they could have a car with plenty of pep and yet pass emission tests. Only in reality they were polluting more than people knew. They paid out an insane amount in fines and had to reprogram a ton of vehicles. If VW has to resort to cheating I am pretty sure there just isn't a better way of doing things. If there is truly a way to get 100 MPG then someone would have done it and would be making freaking mint. I hear many claims but have never see a proof of concept.
joracer1
joracer1 2 months ago
It's Ogle patten from 1980.... we ordered a kit, $100 we build it in 1983 we went from 21mpg to 85mpg, lost about 1/2 the power of the engine, it was a buick v8 so it still had plenty of power.....we used the exhaust running through a stainless steel tube in another stainless can, it was used to heat fuel, fuel was sprayed on the hot coil, the fuel boiled turned to a vapor, then it moved through a tube to feed the carb, 2 .187 jets fed the engine, it lost some power but ran rather well you need another valve to allow extra vapor in during big hills or accelerating plus you need an existing carb to run engine until it warms up. After warm up you can kill the gasoline carb run off the new vapor carb ... also exhaust fumes were non existant. This is nothing new, it does work, and you are right, but push it too hard and your person safety will be jeopardized... think they are moving 60 billion gals of oil a day, they might object if you cut that to say 6 billion. Word of advise. Build one for yourself and keep you mouth shut....
Jeff Hague
Jeff Hague 2 months ago
Well I have an old portable cook stove in my camper that runs on unleaded gas Pour gas into the tank pump up the pressure and the burners look clean and blue like the propane models Have never checked to see if it’s more cost effective tho
1st Amendment
1st Amendment 2 months ago
If you still believe Oil comes from fossilized Dinosaurs. You need to rethink your education.
Allen Wayman
Allen Wayman 2 months ago
I wonder what this guy is working for anyway America the governments already have other technologies that people should be able to transport themselves around the world without using gasoline and it’s free they won’t give it to us they’re keeping us a slave to the money system so they can keep themselves in power that’s the real thing.
Adrien Pitre
Adrien Pitre 2 months ago
It seems like a good simple method but forgot one thing ...... they will not make money if they come out with something like this. lol and we all know who they are lol
George Germain
George Germain 2 months ago
Just look what they did to Stanley Meyer! If you don't know look him up
vtg100
vtg100 2 months ago
Anybody pushing battery powered cars please remember they have to be charged...using power from??? Coal/nuclear/oil also batteries have environmental costs too. Even solar panels have to be made from rare earth ingredients requiring mining/processing.
vtg100
vtg100 2 months ago
Great. Turn it into gas first. Then compress the gas...which turns it back to liquid ??? Mmmm. So what?
dcbourbonireland
dcbourbonireland 2 months ago
thanks for the comments was able to stop video at 3 minute mark save some my life what i saw is what i already know
Don McWilliam
Don McWilliam 2 months ago
Bogus waste of time.
Dar Tice
Dar Tice 2 months ago
I don't really think you know what you're talkin about. You need to spend some time watching the RUvid channel engineering explained.
Centurion Wizofid
Centurion Wizofid 2 months ago
Well - one thing is for sure. 45 years ago, I found the vapour carbs of the 20's and 30's. They were large and since it was readily combustive, you had a explosive mixture during an accident. Metals were not as strong as they are now. You could burn exhaust valves quick. The one thing I recall is that 4 barrels were good at burning or at least dumping fuel down the intake. The smog stuff, the CAT is only there to make sure that everything out the pipe is charred and no hydro-carbons escape without being reduced with O2. I drove a V8 in the 70's and it got 14 to 30 mpg depending on conditions. Today, a 1/2 ton V8 gets about the same mileage as I did all those years ago. Have we really improved anything, or just muddied the waters and you don't know. It matters not what you or I believe, we are both right. Cheers
Sparky Runner
Sparky Runner 2 months ago
Stuck out in the middle of the desert at night for 5 hours until someone came to rescue us after a friend had installed the gas saving wonder to save mankind. The police rescue team said it has more to do with the motor, the outside temperature, weather conditions and the quality of the gas , extra super premium is not what you think it is !!! Next time get a modle T Ford or a smart car this unnecessary rescue will cost each of you $1,000 a piece we could charge you for the helicopter service but you were just lucky they were just in the area at the same time or that would have been an additional 5 thousand stupids ! So we were smart an became police officers to rescue other smart idiots !!!!
JazlDazl
JazlDazl 2 months ago
Clickbait
Kenneth M. Price Jr.
You are absolutely correct about the use of gasoline vapor verses the fueling systems that we have today. But don't forget that Big Oily has the plans to the Pogue Carburetor, 1936, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Nelson_Pogue and hundreds if not thousands of designs like it. So why don't we have this simple vapor technology? Because they want us to burn the volumes of gasoline that they sell us. They do not care that the expense of their profits is our human environment. For the full story: theriseandstallofthepistonengine.weebly.com/
doug wathen
doug wathen 2 months ago
the problem is that is the government likes money rather than saving the planet
Dbf Crell
Dbf Crell 2 months ago
Spark plugs do not ignite a fuel and air mixture (5:11). It ignites a gasoline and air mixture. Gasoline and air = fuel, not fuel and air. Thanks for the education.
Steve Smith
Steve Smith 2 months ago
Unfortunately Smokey Yunik beat you to the punch, he invented the super heated hot air engine concept in the late 80's... Where he preheated the intake / fuel charge to the point where the fuel was vaporized before entering the combustion chamber... his results were amazing, except for the fact that the engine ran so hot that the oil in the crankcase literally cooked itself to the point of being useless.... BTW you could have saved 12min. and got to the point...
brad Payn
brad Payn 2 months ago
This guy knows the basics of int combustion engines but nothing else. I hope that he is happ in his little world. Every engine manufacturer is in on the joke? All those engineeres know nothing HUH?
Murray Runge
Murray Runge 2 months ago
Doesn't make a difference at what point the gas as liquid turns to a gas it still burns the same amount but it is much more unstable as a gas so that is why it is much safer to mix it inside the engine than outside of it. Just imagine a flash back would be like a bomb. What a crazy idea! Burning wood gasses after filtration was done in olden times and it was very unsafe. Better to change the wood gas into wood alcohol and run that through a carburetor or injection system. Your half ton likely gets 15-20 miles per gallon so this concept does not increase mileage by 500% it may increase but not noticeably. I think your just a goof who likes to talk but not say anything.
Stephen Parsley
Stephen Parsley 2 months ago
perhaps the answer is to use lithium - then use the savings to invent faśt charge tech - like super-capacitors, or quick change, universal packs!
RC Adventure
RC Adventure 2 months ago
I think everybody on this planet knows gas comes from oil
John Andrews
John Andrews 2 months ago
Boy! This guy must be rolling in dough with the patent he has on this one simple trick!
Mark T
Mark T 2 months ago
Fuel is formulated to Burn DIRTY ! They fix it that way ! Cerma gas additive breaks to oil molecules free to burn ,i know i drive a bmw m3 with a 12 to 1 com using 87 Octane even better gas MPG UNHEARD OF ! ALL TRUE
Joel Nazara
Joel Nazara 2 months ago
If each vehicle is creating four tons of air pollution each year, how would you weigh that if it's floating in the air? Four tons? That sounds like sudo science being regurgitated to me. But I totally agree with you on the uses of gasoline as a "gas". A nice old man that used to work at Chevy's invention department showed me the exact thing 30 years ago. Can you help me do it for myself and so I can help others? I mean real instructions.
Kelly Thompson
Kelly Thompson 2 months ago
Fuel as we know it is going to be history soon. We need more technology in solar and hydrogen fuel, and fill it up with water and keep going.
Jim Yost
Jim Yost 2 months ago
Usually the 'simple trick' costs a lot of money.
gary vonneida
gary vonneida 2 months ago
Stalin really wanted the media (newspapers) and Hollywood ( people's diversionary dream world expectations---ta-da---aint it a gas?
gary vonneida
gary vonneida 2 months ago
Tesla was destroyed when His Mentor(s) realized free power would "net" Them nothing--ta-da!
gary vonneida
gary vonneida 2 months ago
The continual re-mixturing of fuel chemestry negated Charles Pugh's fuel to piston DEVICE worked a wonder--Tuning the device to "faulty fuels" made mass production's eventual problems eventually unsurmountable.
gary vonneida
gary vonneida 2 months ago
Charles Pough developed a carburettaor (?) that developed 100 mpg in a V-8 Ford flat head. Some attained 300 MPG.
gary vonneida
gary vonneida 2 months ago
Figures can lie and Those that figure regularly lie. Gary
Mick Carson
Mick Carson 2 months ago
WTF is this shit, Mr Professor? We already know the secret but still don't have any other means of running a car on water
Indrajit Majumdar
Indrajit Majumdar 2 months ago
So basically the concept is to take fuel and air mixture in a separate burning chamber to burn it continuously and as cleanly as possible to create a continuous supply of high pressure gas and feed it in a controlled way to the block-piston-crank setup to run it. Just like a steam engine. So, why not feed some FREE natural liquid water in the external burning chamber to use the already existing heat to make some more extra gas to contribute??? But, however we decide to do it, when it comes to a external burning chamber concept then the feeder pipe diameter and the piston chamber diameter ratio have to be maintained (maybe controlled) properly to have a good acceptable power and acceleration balance. But that's a instant realization that the fuel will get much more time to burn so will burn much more cleanly. But as the external burning chamber is burning continuously so also getting fuel feed continuously so when feeding the gas to the piston chamber it will tend to get some un-burnt fuel too. So my question is how will you prevent that or so to say minimize that??? Maybe burn it again in the piston chamber by mixing the feeding gas with some fresh air ?????? (Just a thought.) EDIT: My English is excessively good ;) and I am unfamiliar with your accent so I maybe completely or partially misunderstood your "trick" concept. So that's a disclaimer. Feel free to correct me.
lite azwell
lite azwell 2 months ago
My Hemi has 16 plugs
TBull Cajunbreadmaker
Crude oil is a renewable resource and is abiotic. It is generated continuously by mother earth. It is one of the most abundant liquids on Earth. It is not running out it is continually being created in huge volumes all over the world just about anywhere and everywhere.
Thomas Lee
Thomas Lee 3 months ago
Dream on!
Rich Resident
Rich Resident 3 months ago
Pay no mind to the naysayers..I think that you are on the right track..
brad notachance
brad notachance 3 months ago
Petrol is not made from fossils fossil fuel is a lie . Research it.
James Grasso
James Grasso 3 months ago
I think the 4K likes were all Canadians
DrQuadrivium
DrQuadrivium 3 months ago
*_"It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they have been fooled"_* ~ Mark Twain. .
D.T. Baker
D.T. Baker 3 months ago
Oh bullshit.
Jeff P
Jeff P 3 months ago
JUST ANOTHER STUPID PROGRAMMED DUMB ASS STUPID FUCK... BRAINLESS AND AND ABSOLUTE FOOL AND IDIOT... FUCKING DUMB ASS FUCKING STUPID FUCKS ALL AROUND US...ME... PLEASE STOP THE FUCKING WORLD... I SERIOUSLY WANT OFF CAN'T WAIT FOR THE LORD JESUS TO RETURN AN FIX EVERYTHING...BELIEVE ME... HE WILL...
Next videos
7 STRANGEST New Engines
05:38
Coca Cola vs Radiador
09:50
Views 11 000 000
The End of Muscle Cars
07:02
Uber vs. Lyft
11:24
Views 113 885