Dark

I Found The Source of the Coronavirus

laowhy86
Subscribe
Views 2 247 267
96% 21 697 776

Hey Laowinners,
After 2 weeks of painstaking searching, I refute the claim that the Coronavirus started outside of China.
◘ Support me on Patreon for early release, and much more! www.patreon.com/laowhy86
◘ Donate and support this channel through Paypal paypal.me/cmilkrun
◘ OR Become a Sponsor on RUvid:
ruvid.net/show-UChvithwOECK5g_19TjldMKwsponsor
Thanks to Snarky Guy for the footage - Check his China channel here - ruvid.net/show-UCaUlyGQGo6RFBVk_z8hqT2g
◘ My TV show: Conquering Northern China:
vimeo.com/ondemand/conqueringnorthernchina
◘ Conquering Southern China
vimeo.com/ondemand/conqueringsouthernchina
◘ Discount code for both shows: laowinning
◘ Join me every week for videos about China! Don't forget to subscribe!
ruvid.net/u-laowhy86
Be a Laowinner!
Like comment subscribe!
◘ Facebook:
facebook.com/laowhy86
◘ Instagram:
instagram.com/laowhy86
Music in this video - The Muse Maker
soundcloud.com/themusemaker
◘ Music used most of the time - New World Hip Hop
soundcloud.com/apollodrivenz
ruvid.net/show-UCgirAE5d8ufiotRXmBZZbBQ
Links for proof:
www.whiov.cas.cn/105341/
www.whiov.cas.cn/105341/201911/t20191118_5438006.html
www.whiov.cas.cn/105341/201912/t20191224_5471634.html
159.226.126.127:8082/web/17190/20
159.226.126.127:8082/web/17190/46
gd.whiov.cas.cn/zxpy/yjsswgg/201409/t20140923_258008.html
rfi.my/5OFG
rfi.my/5OSZ
gd.whiov.cas.cn/tzgg/201111/t20111104_151377.html
www.whiov.ac.cn/tzgg_105342/202002/t20200216_5500201.html
blog.creaders.net/u/3027/202002/366239.html
www.backchina.com/blog/261460/article-314718.html
www.bjnews.com.cn/news/2020/02/26/695325.html
bbs.pku.edu.cn/v2/post-read.php?bid=1465&threadid=17542777&page=5

Published on

 

Apr 1, 2020

Share:

Link:

Download:

Loading link...

Add to:

My playlist
Watch later
Comments 80
laowhy86
laowhy86 2 months ago
◘ Support me on Patreon to help with demonetization - www.patreon.com/laowhy86 ◘ Donate and support this channel through Paypal paypal.me/cmilkrun
David T
David T 7 days ago
This video and the info was debunked by potholer54. Googling and reading conspiracy forums does not count as research. The scientific community overwhelmingly agree that the coronavirus has a natural origin. All this video and C-milk is doing is spreading false information.
Ian Duke
Ian Duke 13 days ago
@Daniel Stone "it's really sad to see you spreading this nonsense" Well he is sad, pathetic, illogical unable to look up basic facts and use simple reasoning!
Daniel Stone
Daniel Stone 13 days ago
it's really sad to see you spreading this nonsense
Ian Duke
Ian Duke 14 days ago
@Sean Elliott You tube should also be banning stupid lie videos! They can do that at the same time! Thats an actual fix to the problem!
Sean Elliott
Sean Elliott 14 days ago
Demonitisation was deserved. Your channel is putting out irresponsible disinformation.
Spacemonkeymojo
Did you delete my comment? I got into specifics re the virus about the furin protease site at the spike protein and you deleted my comment? Is it because I said you moved to China for pussy? Come on man, you know you did, why would you try and hide that? Be proud that you have an Asian fetish, white man!
Spacemonkeymojo
Nuke Xi Jinpings house please.
Troy Brophy
Troy Brophy 10 hours ago
The conjecture in this video has been soundly dismantled by potholer54.
Patricia Hinton
Except it’s clear the medical system in my country has absolutely *not* been overwhelmed with “covid patients”...
Kranky. K!
Kranky. K! 2 days ago
It's not only CCPs fault, many countries didn't want to shutdown when the problem was small.
Luma nation
Luma nation 2 days ago
ice cold
DliXc
DliXc 2 days ago
You don't go googling and say its research of the truth Bro. If it is that easy to solve the source of the virus, many should already solve it🙄
polygamous1 Sozou
What goes round comes round I think one day u be held accountable for your videos Mathew Not China
Why youtube why
Why youtube why 3 days ago
Ugh I wish you would blur their faces they’re so horrifically ugly, they’re like failed lab experiments
zaeyan yorlander
zaeyan yorlander 4 days ago
Lol so either youtube is playing up and deleted/hid my comment randomly, or you deleted/hid my original comment. If it was you laowhy, that's pathetic. Talk about you censoring people after potholer54 blew you out of the water. You're not gonna beat the CCP's lies with more lies man.
Spacemonkeymojo
He deleted mine too. I agreed with him, postulated my own theory, but said he moved to China for pussy, he probably deleted it because of that, LOL.
Paul H
Paul H 4 days ago
potholer54 exposed your lies.
Furry Fuzzy
Furry Fuzzy 5 days ago
I feel Bat women knows a lot more. Just look at the countries and research labs that she has either worked at or visited.
Dakoje
Dakoje 5 days ago
this whole video is fucking wrong - you just gbtfo by potholer54
neil barnard
neil barnard 6 days ago
Still got this sack of horse shit up then?
Damin Ledford
Damin Ledford 6 days ago
See. Simple. No "Conspiracy Theories". Public information. No agenda. Just some research, and a advisement to be safe. I appreciate your effort. Take care.
51TGM71
51TGM71 6 days ago
And now you can go and check out Potholer54 for actual research and not just google searches like he did here.
Richard Li
Richard Li 6 days ago
Do you work for the Fool-You Starategy Agency?Well done
Dallas DeLay
Dallas DeLay 7 days ago
Share it I did C milk you are a Hero
Dallas DeLay
Dallas DeLay 7 days ago
You and Winston are my new news source. Formosa And Epoch NewTang
Andy Li
Andy Li 7 days ago
should one watch this video while in china.... *face palm* see u all on the other side i guess...kthxbai
Puffalupagus
Puffalupagus 7 days ago
Now that this video has been thoroughly debunked do you intend to issue any retraction or correction?
Anyienk9
Anyienk9 7 days ago
I find this video severly lacking in everything except for theories... For the first, that claim was never taken seriously by anyone, it was a angry statement made after Dump claimed he had seen "evidence" that it was made in a lab in China (Even though all his information networks say that no such evidence exist, and he refuses to show the evidence to the world). The truth is, COVID-19 is a natural virus created inside a biological lab called a bat. Then it was either trasnfered to another animal before it ended up in a human, or it transfered directly when a human ate a bat. Even the point that some is saying that the bat was eaten in Wuhan is disputed since CORVID-19 is know to not show any symptoms at all before it´s too late. so the person can have eaten the bat in another country and just became sick when they returned to Wuhan.
Supreme Reader
Supreme Reader 7 days ago
Everyone please share this as much as possible, if not for yourself for that poor researcher. No matter how much media tries to put out straw man about ‘wasn’t created in a lab.’ We can see it was being studied there, it got out and now here we are.
51TGM71
51TGM71 6 days ago
Dude everything in this video is just plain wrong.
David T
David T 7 days ago
FAKE NEWS 🤦‍♂️
David T
David T 7 days ago
Laowhy what you are doing is simply irresponsible. There is no evidence nor any scientific backing behind these claims. This is simply a conspiracy theory on Chinese forums yet you are putting this out as fact. Googling and using other conspiracy theories is not evidence!!!! Shame on you for spreading fake news!!
David T
David T 7 days ago
This video and the info was debunked by potholer54. Googling and reading conspiracy forums does not count as research. The scientific community overwhelmingly agree that the coronavirus has a natural origin. All this video and C-milk is doing is spreading false information.
Joshua Hickin
Joshua Hickin 8 days ago
Remove this false video
Ralph Hardie
Ralph Hardie 9 days ago
This is all rubbish
Deadman
Deadman 8 days ago
Shut the fuck up Ralph, you wouldn't know rubbish if it was in your mouth.
Memo1
Memo1 9 days ago
I cannot access the first 5 links now!!!!!! Has anyone got these pages saved somewhere?
mini muffinsxxx
mini muffinsxxx 10 days ago
How did this not get nuked by RUvid's algorithms?
Andrew
Andrew 9 days ago
Maybe because he didn't actually do any research into things and gathered poor sources and thus his "work" is actually more harmful because it spreads disinformation instead of actual information? I mean... that's my guess anyways...
alexandre dubois
alexandre dubois 10 days ago
You are truly disapointing, spreading fake lies and complotist theory. That is a shame, just go back to usa and enjoy your racist and biased country...
wahova
wahova 10 days ago
You was a cheerleader for 9 years for the CCP
scott baker
scott baker 10 days ago
American 5 year resident of Luoyang agreeing with everything you are presenting about china. people who speak upagainst the CCP there "will be disappeared". 将消失, Jiāng xiāoshī
Miss Kealoha
Miss Kealoha 11 days ago
Virus deaths are not on the consciousness of CCP members. They have no conscience. It is definitely their fault though and they all need to be jailed for life.
Karl Andersson
Karl Andersson 11 days ago
This is highly convincing. I wonder how the rest of the world will react once their intelligence agencies probably reaches similar conclusions
51TGM71
51TGM71 6 days ago
Haha or they just did actual research and found out these theories are just bullshit.
Super Scoops™
Super Scoops™ 11 days ago
I can't believe the CCP thinks they're actually fooling anyone with their trolls in the comment section. Aside from the shilled video in question being totally fucking fake, nobody types the way they do in response to youtube drama.
Santiago Bron
Santiago Bron 11 days ago
search up pothole54 and occam's razor. just some advice. you clearly searched this to fit your bias.
travelingmoreno84
travelingmoreno84 12 days ago
The CCP have no consciousness.
Chem Man Dan
Chem Man Dan 12 days ago
There’s something strange about the transparency this video continues to hold. With so much overwhelming evidences and staggering rationality behind its conclusions, you’d think it would have been removed from RUvid by now... If google is really changing the location on google maps of research lab in question, why haven’t they ‘changed’ the transparency of this video? Google owns RUvid...
51TGM71
51TGM71 6 days ago
The truth is that there is no evidence in this video, only lies.
honeysucklecat
honeysucklecat 12 days ago
When are you going to respond to Potholer54? Or are you Yet Another conspiracy pusher who gets a thrill from hurting people?
honeysucklecat
honeysucklecat 4 days ago
erik shure it’s the primary motivation for many (not all) of them. And money
erik shure
erik shure 7 days ago
You think that people who believe in conspiracies get a thrill out of harming people?
Steelmage99
Steelmage99 12 days ago
For fuck's sake, check your sources before you spread such nonsense, In time like this, there isn't room for greedy pricks like you hungering for clicks. "After 2 weeks of painstaking research...." GFTO
Esotericles
Esotericles 18 hours ago
@Deadman I can't tell if you are Poeing me. In case you are being serious, no, Potholer does not believe that, nor is he any sort of conspiracy theorist. By saying such things you're only making yourself look even more ridiculous.
Deadman
Deadman 22 hours ago
@Esotericles Potholer believes the moon is made of cheese. His video doesn't matter, hes a radical conspiracy theorist.
Esotericles
Esotericles Day ago
@Deadman Like potholer already did?
Deadman
Deadman 5 days ago
@Steelmage99 How about you go ahead and disprove his evidence smart guy. Show and explain how his research is underwhelming, with sources like he has that are reputable like his.
Steelmage99
Steelmage99 7 days ago
@erik shure "People like you almost do just as much harm as conspiracy peddlers." Not even close. Short-sighted idiots like Laowhy needs to be told they are short-sighted idiots. If he couldn't figure out how underwhelming his "research" was, then his critical thinking skills (or lack thereof) wont let him gain understanding. He just needs to be told....repeatedly. Way too many Americans reads the kind of idiocy, that Laowhy sprouted. That is more damaging that you can ever imagine. "Just pathetic." Yes, he is.
Tkachev Eugene
Tkachev Eugene 12 days ago
Coronavirus is Chernobyl times 1000. USSR lasted 5 years after Chernobyl. China will not last this long.
51TGM71
51TGM71 12 days ago
Seems like Europe and America has taken bigger hit from this than China.
Alexander Lindner
Alexander Lindner 13 days ago
"After 2 weeks of painstaking searching" - After two weeks of confirmation bias cherry-picking that made you feel good, Matthew.
51TGM71
51TGM71 6 days ago
@Victor Thomas Everything he said in the video. There are comment around in here explaining it but Potholer54s video is far better. Check it out.
Who said it was me?
Hi troll
Victor Thomas
Victor Thomas 11 days ago
What information was bias? Why don’t you clear it up.
Mahone
Mahone 13 days ago
I wonder how you're gonna respond to potholer's vid.
Corey Johnson
Corey Johnson 5 days ago
@I I I watched the video and was impress by the impartially
I I
I I 6 days ago
@​Corey Johnson You said: "Source?" Great question. Thanks for being skeptical. Unfortunately, Laowhy86 blocks my links to sources on his channel. Feel free to post a comment on Potholer54's most recent video, and direct the comment to me with my name and " @ ". I'll post the sources as a response to you.
Corey Johnson
Corey Johnson 6 days ago
@I I Source?
I I
I I 6 days ago
Some say SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab in Wuhan. Problems with this idea include: 1) There's no reported evidence of that lab working with SARS-CoV-2. In fact, a Western researcher who helped gather viruses for that lab notes that they didn't have SARS-CoV-2, as does a researcher from that lab. Other researchers who work with viruses also confirmed that it was very unlikely that a virus like this one would result from break out from a lab. Moreover, comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 to viral sequences from that lab support the claim that the virus was not in that lab. Labs can check if they have a particular virus like SARS-CoV-2 in many ways, including: - compare SARS-CoV-2's to the sequence of viruses in their lab - run PCR using primers specific to SARS-CoV-2 to see if that PCR amplifies any DNA (or RNA, for reverse transcription PCR) for their viruses - run an ELISA with SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies to see if they got positive results for any of their viruses - check if their viruses have the same tropism as SARS-CoV-2 (ex: see if any of their viruses can infect cells modified to bind to SARS-CoV-2) - look at the structure of SARS-CoV-2 and see it doesn't have the structure of a virus that's been maintained in vitro - see if they house animals that can be infected with SARS-CoV-2, or whether they even have any animals for in vivo maintenance of virus And so on. So it's implausible to think that scientists at this lab couldn't check whether they had SARS-CoV-2. 2) SARS-CoV-2's structure strongly implies it's been developing in a living organism with an immune system, not just passaged in vitro. Passaging it in vitro would not efficiently select for the adaptations the virus needs to cause disease in humans and evade the immune system, likely resulting in loss of these adaptations. 3) SARS-CoV-2 developed in organisms, has similar sequences to other naturally-occurring viruses, and has sequences strongly implying it evolved to better infect organisms while remaining within organisms. So the most parsimonious explanation is that it evolved naturally from other viruses within organisms, instead of being grown and engineered in a lab. A natural environment would offer a much longer time-frame for the virus to evolve to the point where it could successfully infect humans, along with many more chances for selection pressure to be applied to the virus in many more organisms. That's important because of the large evolutionary time [20 - 80 years] between SARS-CoV-2 and its closest known relatives. 4) The virus displays the same pattern of selection as seen in other viruses evolving in a natural environment in which they are fairly well-adapted, as opposed to forced selection under less hospitable conditions in a lab. SARS-CoV-2 displays the same pattern of selection as other naturally-occurring viruses its closely genetically-related to. 5) The virus has a better chance of infecting people outside of a lab than inside a lab. For example, the outside environment has little-no-safety features for limiting infection in comparison to a lab, more people to infect, more non-human animals to complete zoonotic transfer to humans, more virus to infect people, etc. Moreover, scientists often de-activate the viruses they're working with, which prevents the virus from infecting them, while allowing the scientists to still study the virus' genetics. 6) This is 'lab of the gaps' nonsense, akin to 'God of the gaps' nonsense. Humans once didn't know what caused various diseases; that didn't justify them saying 'God secretly did it.' Similarly, just because some paranoid non-experts don't grasp the origins of SARS-CoV-2, that doesn't mean they get to insert an evidence-free, paranoid conspiracy about how 'a lab secretly did it.' They're multiplying entities beyond necessity by positing a baseless conspiracy theory in which a lab got a virus secretly, infected someone, covered it up, and got other people to help them in the cover-up, instead of the more parsimonious explanation that the virus arose and spread in a purely natural way like many other viruses [ex: SIV jumping to humans due to humans butchering on non-human primates, etc., leading to SIV evolving into HIV]. So until the conspiracy theorists provide evidence, their explanation can be discarded by Hitchens' razor.
Santiago Bron
Santiago Bron 11 days ago
he's not
Fiona Ma
Fiona Ma 13 days ago
Are you serious? Everyone wants attention but this really isn’t a good topic to be misleading people on.
Alexander Lindner
Alexander Lindner 13 days ago
@51TGM71 Yes I watch most of Matthew's and Winston's content, and it has to be said that they brought some critical information about China to a western audience. So credit where credit is due. That being said, we are all - really all of us - subject to biases driven by our emotions, which lead us to cherry-pick and confirm what we want to see, without us even noticing it. That's a subject I study since years, and it led me to understand how strong this is in our brains. Most people do this without ill intent, and I don't see Matthew consciously misleading the audience. He is however clearly in a phase of "falling out of love" with China, and I think that led him to connect dots he shouldn't have, and to fall into the confirmations bias trap.
51TGM71
51TGM71 13 days ago
@Alexander Lindner Have you checked his content the last 6 months? I mean he is obsessed with finding small things to misslead and then have a clickbait title.
Alexander Lindner
Alexander Lindner 13 days ago
He wasn't intentionally misleading. It's just inconscient confirmation bias and cherry picking, and he didn't even notice it.
whitedeath9
whitedeath9 14 days ago
I think you should address the points made in the potholer54 video, I say this in good faith, and as a fan of your work.
Superior Being
Superior Being 14 days ago
Knobhead!
Mitch Lang
Mitch Lang 14 days ago
potholer54 has exposed the bat-crappy research and outright falsehoods of this video. If you think I’m saying this baselessly, watch potholer54’s video on the Wuhan lab and see for yourself if his corrections don’t hold up.
Ger Tar
Ger Tar 14 days ago
Hi, I respect your work but the new potholer video response to this would require a response. He did some thorough research and his video is not based on any personal beef with you. Moreover, he also doesn't seem to be a fan of the Chinese government. I think he made great points, and it would be nice if you could respond to them by either refuting or just accepting responsibility for the mistakes you made in this video. Peace.
Will H
Will H 14 days ago
To all the people who flocked to this video from Potholer54's debunking of this pathological liar's garbage: don't waste your time trying to debate with laowhy86's fans. Most of them are far-right lowlife bigots who love his anti-China content, no matter how much of it is exaggerated, generalisations or straight up lies. They will overzealously defend him and even call you a CCP shill or "wumao" if you refute anything that debunks their anti-China confirmation bias. Hearing either of those either means they have no argument, or they're plain stupid. Good luck to you.
erik shure
erik shure 7 days ago
*Most* of his fans are far-right, lowlife bigots? Citation needed. Also, I'm sure calling his audience this will definitely help change their minds. Certainly your comment is not solidifying his audience's position.
Clovis Jako
Clovis Jako 14 days ago
To all the potholer viewers coming here to criticize: I think the overarching sentiment to take away from this is that we need to have an official investigation into the origin. Ultimately everything is speculative until a proper investigation can be conducted. While Matthew may have reported some facts here inaccurately, there still exists a mountain of circumstantial evidence that needs to be properly investigated. The CCP's actions to suppress information related to the origin and childish retaliatory responses to prompts for investigation only serves to fuel the fire of suspicion related to this speculation. Clearly it is important that we understand the origin of this outbreak so that we can take measures to prevent a recurrence in the future. Honestly many of Potholer's points taken refuting this video seem pedantic to me. Is there some grave consequence associated with conflating some of these misstated facts? Are we not ultimately in accord asking for a proper investigation and accountability? Finally I think the distinction between "man made" and "leaked from a lab" needs to be very clear- I think this is just as important as distinguishing between the CCP and the Chinese populace when discussing any of this subject matter. Potholers title of "started in a lab" bends this spectrum into uncomfortable ambiguity for me.
51TGM71
51TGM71 3 days ago
@Clovis Jako There is no evidence of it leaking from a lab and since the virus all ready was on nature, in bats, there doesnt have to be leak to beginn with. The more possible alternative is the reality we live in that it came from the wet market (or maybe the rural farmlands). Matt here is not interested in the official narrative but instead searches for theories that supports his bias against the CCP.
Clovis Jako
Clovis Jako 3 days ago
@51TGM71 I'm only going to say this one more time: IT IS IMPORTANT TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN: -Leaked from a lab and -Man Made Stop ignoring my main point. I have never claimed to have evidence proving either case. I have repeatedly stated WE NEED A PROPER INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE ANYTHING HERE. Either you need to learn to read better, you don't care to explore the true meaning behind my words, or you're a paid shill. Please stop wasting my time.
51TGM71
51TGM71 3 days ago
@Clovis Jako The virus originated from nature, it is very easy to see if a virus was made in a lab. This is easy to look up even for you. It is lot my job to prove a negative, you who make the positive claim have to provide evidence. If you really care so much I suggest you look in to this yourself or simply watch Potholer54 video.
Clovis Jako
Clovis Jako 3 days ago
@51TGM71 I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. Absolutely 0 research has been conducted regarding whether or not this virus was in a lab before it escaped. Opinions have been formed regarding genetic manipulation of the virus, but even those are only that- opinions. There is no conclusive research so far regarding the origin of this virus. Thanks for playing! (Feel free to cite sources of a scientific origin with CONCLUSIVE results regarding whether or not this virus was in a lab at some point. I'll be waiting ;) )
51TGM71
51TGM71 5 days ago
@Clovis Jako No, it has been done by simple ordinary research of how the virus is made up. And it is a natura virus. Form that it is far more likely that it spread from bat to human either in the rural areas to farmers or the wet markets. There is 0 proof of it "leaking" from a lab, as shown by Potholer54. Matt was incredibly missleading with his video.
SomeRandomGuy
SomeRandomGuy 14 days ago
Anybody came from potholer54's channel?
Sean Elliott
Sean Elliott 14 days ago
This video is irresponsible disinformation, and needs to be taken down.
Presley Perswain
Presley Perswain 13 days ago
Censoring everything you disagree with is bad road to go down. It's better to counter bad information with good information than to simply erase the bad. Censorship will only encourage the conspiracy theorists, and eventually the censors will start using their power to censor merely inconvenient information, rather then incorrect information. Potholer54 did the right thing by showing how this video was wrong rather then doing what many of his viewers are doing here and just demanding it's removal. Hopefully laowhy86 will watch Potholer's video and realize his errors and make an update. But even if he doesn't it is, imho, wrong to demand the removal of this one.
Mitch Lang
Mitch Lang 14 days ago
I don’t think it should be taken down, it should have a big disclaimer though somehow. Or taken down and replaced with a video of the exact same title, but edited to include all corrections and say “I told everyone bullshit” at the start of the video.
hizzle mobizzle
hizzle mobizzle 14 days ago
Yes he should be apologizing instead of continuing to spread lies and disinformation.
Tkachev Eugene
Tkachev Eugene 14 days ago
Check out the number of chinese agents spreading disinfo in comments.
nosferatu5
nosferatu5 14 days ago
@Tkachev Eugene Keep those fingers in your ears, buddy. Its safer inside your own head, in your sweet little fantasies.
Tkachev Eugene
Tkachev Eugene 14 days ago
@Will H noone believes your bullshit, 同志. The judgement day for the CCP is coming. I have seen an empire of lies fall in 1991, now its your turn.
Will H
Will H 14 days ago
laowhy86 used falsified and misleading information and got debunked by a British science journalist. How the fuck does having respect for the truth make you a CCP shill? Fucking idiot.
51TGM71
51TGM71 14 days ago
Yeah haha that has to be it ....
ukwerna
ukwerna 14 days ago
Why the hell do you knowingly lie about things? Why dont you just keep things honest? Everybody seems to be a traitor nowadays. Anyway, hope you are aware that you are absolutely part of the fire that will likely burn. Lets hope I am wrong about that last part.
ukwerna
ukwerna 10 days ago
@Alexander Lindner You are of course correct, I apologze to him (in case he read this at all) if that is the case!
Alexander Lindner
Alexander Lindner 13 days ago
"Why the hell do you knowingly lie about things?" --- I don't think he did. Confirmation bias is a real thing, even for intelligent and well meaning people like Matthew Tye. Most of the time we don't really understand what our brain does. That doesn't mean he shouldn't respond, or take the video down in it's current form however.
ukwerna
ukwerna 13 days ago
@51TGM71 come on, you know what I mean? Its a metaphor, mostly I hope. All this mess going on the world is because for some reason people think lying is part of lfie. Its not. Definetely not in the life of people who bear some kind of responsibility. There was enough time to learn, most didnt, so there you go. You will know what I mean by fire, I hope all this will pan out not too tough.
51TGM71
51TGM71 14 days ago
@ukwerna What "fire"?
ukwerna
ukwerna 14 days ago
@51TGM71 lol exactly what I am saying
JJ Journeyman
JJ Journeyman 14 days ago
People should also check out Potholer54 for a rebuke to the information contained in this video
Ger Tar
Ger Tar 14 days ago
@hizzle mobizzle actually, the truth can also be quite fun. potholer54's style is good. I enjoyed his videos as well as laowhy86's videos.
Will H
Will H 14 days ago
@hizzle mobizzle Because all of laowhy86's fans don't care about the truth.
hizzle mobizzle
hizzle mobizzle 14 days ago
But it's no fun listening to the truth.
Sam
Sam 15 days ago
Extremely inaccurate. Laowhy, need to take this more seriously. Go watch Potholers response to this.
reggiep75
reggiep75 15 days ago
Googling populist views, manipulating them and then redacting aspects of such articles is NOT RESEARCH. You've been found out and your hearsay is little more than 2+2=6.
FlakeSE
FlakeSE 15 days ago
Yet another person willing to make the world a little worse to make a buck, had a look over the videos you made after this and the clickbait is ramped up. The saying goes that pissing in your shoe only warms your feet for a short while.
FlakeSE
FlakeSE 13 days ago
James Smith this video specifically has been thoroughly debunked by independent journalists. CCP does enough shady shit for us not to have to make up more of it.
James Smith
James Smith 13 days ago
Lol okay ccp shill
Robert He
Robert He 15 days ago
This video is the result of a lot of bungled translations and pure falsehoods, which laowhy spread to the western media. Anyone reading this should watch Potholer54's video on the topic for actual science.
Anders Jakobsen
Anders Jakobsen 15 days ago
I feel I am probably just adding to the "go watch Potholer54" dogpile here but probably from a more unique position. I subscribed to your videos AND I supported you through Patrion up until just a few month ago. I liked your and Serpentza travel videos and the valid and serious criticism of China from your unique personal and family perspective. I followed your and your family relocation´back to USA and actually cared for your future. Late last year you started to shift into clickbait territory and away from the well argumented content and it became gradually less interesting to me and I stopped watching your channels. And if you make money from clickbait content I figure you don´t really need my money. I see you have now moved completely into the business of "f*ck PROPER research if it limits my livelihood" that give fodder to the anti science, anti trust subculture that eats the most vulnerable western countries from the inside. This is really a shame not the least because there is serious valid criticism to made of China in regards to Covid-19 and in general but not from people who discredits themselves. Hope you will find your way back or into another profession and all the best to you and your family in the future.
Not Good at Naming Things
@James R - You'd know as you're in the basement next to mine. Are you actually taking this conversation seriously at this point? I started out seriously, but as I saw that you were absolutely resistant to a discussion of facts, as multiple people tried to engage you on the facts and you ignored it every time, I gave up on that.
James R
James R 5 days ago
@Not Good at Naming Things You live in the basement don't you?
Not Good at Naming Things
@James R - No, not a troll, but I'm not taking you seriously because you're using emotion instead of facts and logic. I'm poking fun and having fun. That's all.
James R
James R 5 days ago
@Not Good at Naming Things Fess up, you're a troll. Where are you from?
Not Good at Naming Things
@James R - Reading comprehension. I recommend it.
Gaius Caligula
Gaius Caligula 15 days ago
When Potholer54 calls you out, the only response can be to admit you were wrong. Don't try to fight this cmilk, others have tried and they have made themselves look like fools after Potholer did a video dissecting their claims (Steven Crowder).
Ger Tar
Ger Tar 14 days ago
@honeysucklecat it is not racist to call someone an agent of a different country. it can be bullying and an insult in poor taste, but this liberal use of the word "racist" makes it much harder to really identify people with racial supremacist beliefs.
hizzle mobizzle
hizzle mobizzle 14 days ago
@Jesus Christ granted
Nick
Nick 14 days ago
@honeysucklecat I agree, racist bullying crap must not be tolerated. China is guilty of all of the above you mentioned. Report China or they will continue to shit all over us.
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ 14 days ago
hizzle mobizzle even so, it’s good to set the record straight and own up for his mistakes. A respectable move. Unless that video is full of other unnecessary bs
hizzle mobizzle
hizzle mobizzle 14 days ago
@honeysucklecat If he publishes a retraction it will just be for the clicks.
Josue Barboza
Josue Barboza 15 days ago
You're a fucking degenerate
bakkerman73
bakkerman73 15 days ago
No you found a way to sell more tshirts, nothing more, nothing less :') Your nonsense has been professionally debunked by potholer54.
castro sherwood
castro sherwood 15 days ago
Unlike you, Potholer knows how to do real research. What a terrible hack you are.
erik shure
erik shure 7 days ago
Cruel.
Gabriel
Gabriel 15 days ago
death penalty for xi? sadam did a lot less :o
Gabriel
Gabriel 15 days ago
April fool! :D
aderek79
aderek79 15 days ago
Do a response to the Potholer54 video "Did SARS-Cov-2 start in a Chinese lab?"
polygamous1 Sozou
your having a laugh How on earth can he respond to a truthful video debunking everything he says? see all the virologist on earth including the WHO could not find the source But super intelligence Mathews did n it wont be China who be held responsible for lies Mathew it might well be you
honeysucklecat
honeysucklecat 4 days ago
I I I hope you didn’t type all of that with your phone lol
I I
I I 6 days ago
Some say SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab in Wuhan. Problems with this idea include: 1) There's no reported evidence of that lab working with SARS-CoV-2. In fact, a Western researcher who helped gather viruses for that lab notes that they didn't have SARS-CoV-2, as does a researcher from that lab. Other researchers who work with viruses also confirmed that it was very unlikely that a virus like this one would result from break out from a lab. Moreover, comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 to viral sequences from that lab support the claim that the virus was not in that lab. Labs can check if they have a particular virus like SARS-CoV-2 in many ways, including: - compare SARS-CoV-2's to the sequence of viruses in their lab - run PCR using primers specific to SARS-CoV-2 to see if that PCR amplifies any DNA (or RNA, for reverse transcription PCR) for their viruses - run an ELISA with SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies to see if they got positive results for any of their viruses - check if their viruses have the same tropism as SARS-CoV-2 (ex: see if any of their viruses can infect cells modified to bind to SARS-CoV-2) - look at the structure of SARS-CoV-2 and see it doesn't have the structure of a virus that's been maintained in vitro - see if they house animals that can be infected with SARS-CoV-2, or whether they even have any animals for in vivo maintenance of virus And so on. So it's implausible to think that scientists at this lab couldn't check whether they had SARS-CoV-2. 2) SARS-CoV-2's structure strongly implies it's been developing in a living organism with an immune system, not just passaged in vitro. Passaging it in vitro would not efficiently select for the adaptations the virus needs to cause disease in humans and evade the immune system, likely resulting in loss of these adaptations. 3) SARS-CoV-2 developed in organisms, has similar sequences to other naturally-occurring viruses, and has sequences strongly implying it evolved to better infect organisms while remaining within organisms. So the most parsimonious explanation is that it evolved naturally from other viruses within organisms, instead of being grown and engineered in a lab. A natural environment would offer a much longer time-frame for the virus to evolve to the point where it could successfully infect humans, along with many more chances for selection pressure to be applied to the virus in many more organisms. That's important because of the large evolutionary time [20 - 80 years] between SARS-CoV-2 and its closest known relatives. 4) The virus displays the same pattern of selection as seen in other viruses evolving in a natural environment in which they are fairly well-adapted, as opposed to forced selection under less hospitable conditions in a lab. SARS-CoV-2 displays the same pattern of selection as other naturally-occurring viruses its closely genetically-related to. 5) The virus has a better chance of infecting people outside of a lab than inside a lab. For example, the outside environment has little-no-safety features for limiting infection in comparison to a lab, more people to infect, more non-human animals to complete zoonotic transfer to humans, more virus to infect people, etc. Moreover, scientists often de-activate the viruses they're working with, which prevents the virus from infecting them, while allowing the scientists to still study the virus' genetics. 6) This is 'lab of the gaps' nonsense, akin to 'God of the gaps' nonsense. Humans once didn't know what caused various diseases; that didn't justify them saying 'God secretly did it.' Similarly, just because some paranoid non-experts don't grasp the origins of SARS-CoV-2, that doesn't mean they get to insert an evidence-free, paranoid conspiracy about how 'a lab secretly did it.' They're multiplying entities beyond necessity by positing a baseless conspiracy theory in which a lab got a virus secretly, infected someone, covered it up, and got other people to help them in the cover-up, instead of the more parsimonious explanation that the virus arose and spread in a purely natural way like many other viruses [ex: SIV jumping to humans due to humans butchering on non-human primates, etc., leading to SIV evolving into HIV]. So until the conspiracy theorists provide evidence, their explanation can be discarded by Hitchens' razor.
slangoftheregions
I'm so glad I read this comment. But it's really sad, 2M views vs 87k views...
ding peng
ding peng 8 days ago
Many are pointing to chinese lab from these sources...
J Morris
J Morris 15 days ago
Another lazy click-bait artist debunked by potholer54.
James Meow
James Meow 13 days ago
Potholer criticises the Chinese Government so wut Nick is talking about is ?
honeysucklecat
honeysucklecat 14 days ago
Actually, a lot of Laowhy’s content is excellent. I hope you check it out. But I’m glad to see you here. I’m hoping he sees the Potholer comments, and watches Peter’s vid, and offers up a retraction.
honeysucklecat
honeysucklecat 14 days ago
Jesus Christ this guy Nick should be reported. This kind of trolling racism he’s pushing is clearly hate speech. He’s one of those assholes who has a really tiny pecker that he fondles, for pleasure, as he trolls. He can’t orgasm unless he knows he’s hurting someone. Personally, I let most comments - no matter how much I hate them - slide. But this kind of pure racist hate spreading crosses the line. Together, we can shut them down.
honeysucklecat
honeysucklecat 14 days ago
Nick you are a fucking asshole.
Tom La Pont
Tom La Pont 15 days ago
@Nick So you don't question the guy whose livelihood depends on these videos getting clicks and attention, but you question the monetary incentives of randos posting comments on RUvid?
Grandy Candlestick
Grandy Candlestick 15 days ago
Why did you completely misrepresent Lotao and Lei Xiao’s paper? For views? Why are you so desperate? The paper cited zero evidence. The splashing bat blood and urine described in the paper did not happen in the lab. As the paper clearly states, this occurred while collecting bats in the wild. Also, this paper, which is really just speculation with no scientific basis, makes the mistake of stating that a bat would have had to fly into the market in order to infect people, and therefore it is possible that it came from the lab. This ignores the fact the transmission to human would have occurred through another animal, like a pangolin. Please do the right thing and retract this video and publish an apology for what appears to be an attempt to deceive the public for self-serving reasons.
koeksjaak
koeksjaak 15 days ago
Laowhy, I have watched your videos for a long while and I respect you and SerpentZA a lot. When watching this video however, I was skeptical because it all felt highly conspiritorial. Now that Potholer54 addressed the issues with your theory, this skepticism has become quite a lot stronger. Could you please address his response, and if you believe you were wrong on your assumptions, could you please set the record straight and don't leave over two million people with the wrong information?
I I
I I 6 days ago
Some say SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab in Wuhan. Problems with this idea include: 1) There's no reported evidence of that lab working with SARS-CoV-2. In fact, a Western researcher who helped gather viruses for that lab notes that they didn't have SARS-CoV-2, as does a researcher from that lab. Other researchers who work with viruses also confirmed that it was very unlikely that a virus like this one would result from break out from a lab. Moreover, comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 to viral sequences from that lab support the claim that the virus was not in that lab. Labs can check if they have a particular virus like SARS-CoV-2 in many ways, including: - compare SARS-CoV-2's to the sequence of viruses in their lab - run PCR using primers specific to SARS-CoV-2 to see if that PCR amplifies any DNA (or RNA, for reverse transcription PCR) for their viruses - run an ELISA with SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies to see if they got positive results for any of their viruses - check if their viruses have the same tropism as SARS-CoV-2 (ex: see if any of their viruses can infect cells modified to bind to SARS-CoV-2) - look at the structure of SARS-CoV-2 and see it doesn't have the structure of a virus that's been maintained in vitro - see if they house animals that can be infected with SARS-CoV-2, or whether they even have any animals for in vivo maintenance of virus And so on. So it's implausible to think that scientists at this lab couldn't check whether they had SARS-CoV-2. 2) SARS-CoV-2's structure strongly implies it's been developing in a living organism with an immune system, not just passaged in vitro. Passaging it in vitro would not efficiently select for the adaptations the virus needs to cause disease in humans and evade the immune system, likely resulting in loss of these adaptations. 3) SARS-CoV-2 developed in organisms, has similar sequences to other naturally-occurring viruses, and has sequences strongly implying it evolved to better infect organisms while remaining within organisms. So the most parsimonious explanation is that it evolved naturally from other viruses within organisms, instead of being grown and engineered in a lab. A natural environment would offer a much longer time-frame for the virus to evolve to the point where it could successfully infect humans, along with many more chances for selection pressure to be applied to the virus in many more organisms. That's important because of the large evolutionary time [20 - 80 years] between SARS-CoV-2 and its closest known relatives. 4) The virus displays the same pattern of selection as seen in other viruses evolving in a natural environment in which they are fairly well-adapted, as opposed to forced selection under less hospitable conditions in a lab. SARS-CoV-2 displays the same pattern of selection as other naturally-occurring viruses its closely genetically-related to. 5) The virus has a better chance of infecting people outside of a lab than inside a lab. For example, the outside environment has little-no-safety features for limiting infection in comparison to a lab, more people to infect, more non-human animals to complete zoonotic transfer to humans, more virus to infect people, etc. Moreover, scientists often de-activate the viruses they're working with, which prevents the virus from infecting them, while allowing the scientists to still study the virus' genetics. 6) This is 'lab of the gaps' nonsense, akin to 'God of the gaps' nonsense. Humans once didn't know what caused various diseases; that didn't justify them saying 'God secretly did it.' Similarly, just because some paranoid non-experts don't grasp the origins of SARS-CoV-2, that doesn't mean they get to insert an evidence-free, paranoid conspiracy about how 'a lab secretly did it.' They're multiplying entities beyond necessity by positing a baseless conspiracy theory in which a lab got a virus secretly, infected someone, covered it up, and got other people to help them in the cover-up, instead of the more parsimonious explanation that the virus arose and spread in a purely natural way like many other viruses [ex: SIV jumping to humans due to humans butchering on non-human primates, etc., leading to SIV evolving into HIV]. So until the conspiracy theorists provide evidence, their explanation can be discarded by Hitchens' razor.
realtsavo
realtsavo 7 days ago
@Tkachev Eugene Learn how to read, then go back and re-read my comment. I'm not defending anyone. Literally.
Anyienk9
Anyienk9 7 days ago
@Tkachev Eugene And the Chinese have agreed to it as long as no politics will be involved.
Tkachev Eugene
Tkachev Eugene 9 days ago
@realtsavo why are you trying to protect ccp? Its over for communist china.
realtsavo
realtsavo 9 days ago
@Tkachev Eugene It does matter. You can be critical of two parties at the same time. Check your fucking biases before you assume shit, and watch potholer54's video.
Rahmad Mhirza
Rahmad Mhirza 15 days ago
I've been googling & checing all your claims & sources since this smells like a conspiracy. One thing I'd like to mention, what you read is just unproper translation from what the "source" actualy says. I'm not native to Chinese language, but it is easy to look through by anyone with a smartphone and more than two brain cells. I've comeback to take that like I gave you few days ago. Either you did a big oopsie or you tried to fool your viewer by purposely mislead and falsely claiming all the "info".
Dori C
Dori C 15 days ago
I was almost convinced by the claims in this video but after Potholer52's rebutle I can't in good conscience believe this anymore. Many of the claims you put out are simply inaccurate. There are no labs near the Wohan wet market that work with viruses. There is however a huge culture of people going out into caves and collecting bat droppings for agriculture, or they collect any of the other countless wild animals that could hardor diseases and sell them in that very market. This theory, while tempting, only distracts people from the actual social reform needed in China. Don't ever forget the importance of Occam's razor when looking for the truth.
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ 10 days ago
@Strident Atheist Singapore was communist, now they're capitalist. Without communism in the early stages the entire country would've been too unstable to manage properly, and they had a great leader to lead them to prosperity and better living standards. How did one small island nation become one of the world's best countries in the world? One of the safest, most organized, richest and developed country, was founded off communism.
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ 10 days ago
@Strident Atheist it's actually funny how you keep trying to defend an ideology by kicking a different one to the curb just because someone told you its bad, my bet is that you haven't read Karl Marx's book and assume communism is horrible. Well you're right on the fact that the CCP and most other communist countries has lots of shit in its history but again, everyone who talks about communism hasn't read Marx's original book on communism, anyone who read it would understand how different the CCP and USSR are to true communism. Capitalism is great, but the people on the top of the pyramid will stay on top for a long time, Marx's idea of communism is to implement it when capitalism spirals out of control and the lower class population struggle to survive. Again, communism's ultimate goal is to achieve capitalism and the cycle will continue. Ironic how you call me a wumao just bc I'm talking about communism, I thought name calling was only for butthurt religious people?
Strident Atheist
Strident Atheist 10 days ago
@Jesus Christ Again full of shit. You defended Karl Marx and that's good enough for me. I grew up in Christian base country and worked in a factory all my life. So i know damn well how precious my freedoms are. And furthermore, ANYONE can become rich in this country if they have the ambition, will power & brains to do so. Very few people are rich who did not work very hard to get there & I fully support their right to do so. This is NOT possible under communism....only the gov't gets rich. I became an atheist being under Christian rule, but I'm goddamn sure you can't become or enjoy being a Christian fully without conflict under the Communist Party Of China.... .....now I don't like Christianity, of course, but they have every right under the sun to practice that religion and believe it all they want & do so openly without punishment and I fully support their right to do so. The same is NOT true with communist fucking China... the CCP can fuck off & die a slow death as far as I'm concerned. ANY totalitarian system is bad, either religious or secular. I'm glad we had this conversation because now anyone reading will know how the CCP 50 cent army operates on the net. Yer a CCP piece of shit.... and you've exposed yourself. Try your bullshit on someone else.
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ 10 days ago
@Strident Atheist I never said I supported communism, seriously baffles me how an athiest like yourself constantly makes false assumptions about someone elss, thought that's a religious person's job 😂 but ok what you said about communism is very true, it has little to no checks or balances at all and corruption is rampant in most communist countries. But again if you look at the situation from all perspectives, the law in Americs can be easily bypassed with money and bribery. And its ironic how you talk about better quality of living when America has the most unemployed people in the world, many are living in poverty. I think you only talk on behalf of the wealthier ones. Not to mention, Americans now are pushing for the lifting if lockdown because of "freedom" and "democracy", Americans are really making themselves look like a joke now tbh. I don't participate or care about politics as much as the average person because it's blinding. The two biggest diseases that causes blindness are politics and religion (I'm sure you'd agree with me on the latter), so when you hold firmly to a political belief, chances are that you're brainwashed, in the same way religion brainwashed their believes.
Strident Atheist
Strident Atheist 10 days ago
@Jesus Christ Sigh.... communism strips a person of their individuality. No gov't is perfect, but the American Experiment has proved that the greatest wealth is created by allowing individuals to pursue their hearts desire with the benefit of profit as the end goal. Of course, this allows for smart greedy people to take advantage of their fellow human, but at the end of the day. the entire population benefits. And we have laws to keep a lid on things. At no other time in history, has the common person had so much freedom or personal wealth. Communism has NO checks or balances. Nothing in the entire history of the world gives common people a better quality of living than democracy. Take you commie beliefs & stuff them up your ass. We in the West will use our vast arsenal of nukes if need be to keep communism out.... 2 enemies of freedom right now are the Jihadi Islamists and the communists.... Either or is bad for world peace.
Rohan Parkes
Rohan Parkes 15 days ago
Clearly, it would be irresponsible not to speculate ...
Mike Harrington
Mike Harrington 15 days ago
Matt you need to look up very popular Potholer54 RUvidr who has dissected & discredited your claims on Covid-19 origins as being beliefs not facts.
Our Father In the Green
Watch potholer54's video please
Troy Brophy
Troy Brophy 10 hours ago
People believe what they want. No amount of fact-checking will sway them from the reality they have chosen to live in.
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ 16 days ago
This entire video has been debunked by potholer54. Smh this account only feeds on xenophobic Americans’ desire to diss to China. Now I’m not saying China is all good but this video proves that this video is baloney and the entire channel full of shit🤦🏻‍♂️ I’ve lived in China for 8 years doing my masters’ and PhD. It’s nothing like anything this channel constantly tries to describe. Kinda tragic one individual would go such lengths, kicking an entire country under the curb, to increase views🤦🏻‍♂️
Nicator
Nicator 13 days ago
@Alex covid 19 and lab studied virus is magnitude different from each other even if they are from the same family this video is full of shit, just like sargon.
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ 14 days ago
Alex yes potholer54 said he wouldn’t jump to conclusions on topics that he has no evidence for. And he has no evidence for the virus accidentally infecting a lab worker. The same should go to you and laowhy and all other conspiracy theorists. He said the possibility of the virus passing on to humans via farmers who work in unsanitary conditions is much more possible than the conspiracy theory in a lab. I’m starting to think you haven’t watched the video when coming up with your rebuttals. If you haven’t, please do before you give any further rebuttals😉
Alex
Alex 14 days ago
Jesus Christ Wow, you didn’t to a word I said. I agree it is not a man made virus. It was not modified in any way. However, they do study NATURAL coronaviruses at that lab, nature made and unmodified, for scientific purposes. A lab worker could of got accidentally infected is the theory.
Alex
Alex 14 days ago
Greg Phipps Poholer did not debunk that it could of been a naturally studied coronavirus (they had coronaviruses stored there) where a lab worked could of got accidentally infected. It is not a conspiracy theory in the slightest.
Grandy Candlestick
Grandy Candlestick 14 days ago
Jesus Christ I watched a few of his videos a year or so ago and enjoyed them. I think the issue with RUvidrs in general is that they are rewarded financially by controversial content. I enjoy fact-based reporting, but apparently I am in the minority. That’s the scary thing. The internet was supposed to bring this golden age of citizen journalism, but way too much of it is just another ego-gratifying money-making scheme.
BBRodriquez
BBRodriquez 16 days ago
"After 2 weeks of painstaking searching, I refute..." I guess you mean just googling from home and than spin the narrativ. Hope it was just negligence and not malice.
David T
David T 7 days ago
network 99 you are clearly suffering from confirmation bias. I’m going to stop arguing with you as it will only enforce your beliefs. I just want you to know that I think that you are incorrect. Have a good day and stay healthy.
network 99
network 99 7 days ago
@David T You discredited yourself. Anyone with access to research papers can identify that there are HIV strains in covid19. I'm not sure if you are a CCP shill or not, but if you are tell the CCP to formulate a better storyline. The Maatje Benassi was proven a lie, Fort Detrick lie isn't working, and claiming the virus is 100% natural now after CCP members claimed it was a bioweapon isn't going to work either.
network 99
network 99 7 days ago
@David T Nothing weird about a lab specializing in Coronavirus research being in the same vicinity of a Coronavirus outbreak. Luckily over 100 countries are asking for a probe into China. I'm sure the CCP will make everything look squeaky clean in the lab though. While paying people to discredit anyone who says the virus might come from a lab.
David T
David T 7 days ago
network 99 Also, almost every semi-developed researches viruses to study them and make vaccines. There’s nothing unusual about labs in wuhan studying coronavirus since coronaviruses are very common.
David T
David T 7 days ago
network 99 literally there’s 0 evidence that this virus was man-made and “mixed with HIV”. The genetic sequence of Covid-19 is quite short, so it’s way less complex than a retrovirus like HIV. And China has literally nothing to gain from releasing a virus in their own country, if y’alls conspiracy theories are right, the government would have probably released the virus in a 3rd world country. This video and many others are just fake news.
Helder Ribeiro
Helder Ribeiro 16 days ago
Mate, You just got schooled by a proper journalist (potholer)... Learn to translate... also, "googling" is not "research"...
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ 9 days ago
@Alina Čoholić not everyone who comments against the channel is paid or a wumao, we just want transparent information. And no, my bet is that you haven't watched the video entirely. About 70% of the video was disproving laowhy's claims, inaccurate sources and no fact checking at all. We just hope he has the integrity to admit to his fault and that's a respectable move, lots of his viewers are misled
Alina Čoholić
Alina Čoholić 9 days ago
Where are you guys coming from? Is Potholer paying you? The CCP? Who? Because everyone seems to be claiming that Potholer's video disproves this one but these videos are on two very different topics. Lao's is about the Chinese government's corruption and lies during this whole pandemic, and Potholer's is about what he thinks the US did wrong. Why are people suggesting that video as a companion piece to this one? They're not even talking about the same issue.
LinucNerd
LinucNerd 14 days ago
​@Jesus Christ Well, that is an effective way of getting the attention of laowhy86, so he can correct his mistakes, or at the very least address them.
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ 15 days ago
I like how all viewers of potholer54 are coming on to this video to destroy the misleading “facts” lol
David Battle
David Battle 15 days ago
@Nate S A video by a youtuber called potholer54 famous for debunking poorly researched youtube videos.
B B
B B 16 days ago
You are not a fan of theories or unproven scenarios? Well then you must hate yourself! All you do is peddle B.S. here on RUvid!
Next videos
I'M RADIO REBEL
25:38
Views 3 981 241
Who STOLE all the masks?
1:11:25