Dark

Blue Energy - Ocean Power (Piston Pump & Racks)

lamtengchoy
Subscribe
Views 1 274 427
94% 6 970 408

Blue Energy -- Ocean Power (Piston Pump & Racks)
Fluid Pumping Apparatuses Powered By Waves Or Flowing Currents
A new invention using "Double acting fluid piston pumps extracting energy from waves or flowing currents into electricity. A revolutionary fluid currents energy converter device by combining double acting fluid pumping apparatuses and moveable racks to convert Ocean waves or flowing currents into electricity.
The present invention provide double acting pump mechanisms when the piston reciprocates inside the piston chamber as the piston is driven by a float according to rising and falling waves.
Each pumping apparatus is driven by a float; the pumped fluid (water and/or air) is supplied to drive a fluid motor or a turbine, which in turn operates a generator to produce electric power.
International Patent Application No. PCT/SG2011/000232
www.LamTengChoy.com
Henry Lam Teng Choy
Email : henry@LamTengChoy.com

Science & Technology

Published on

 

Oct 20, 2012

Ocean PowerBlue EnergyRenewable energypiston pumpocean waveocean currentocean tidalnew inventionfluid energy converterwave energyfloatgeneratorturbinepowerelectricitySingapore inventor

Share:

Link:

Download:

Loading link...

Add to:

My playlist
Watch later
Comments 232
MrBigboy1057
MrBigboy1057 25 days ago
The technology is not being furthered because it's just a crock of manure. Just a big word salad that is equivalent to smoke being blown up ones anus. Good way to launder money and buy some blow.
JS Mariani
JS Mariani 25 days ago
the designs that minimize or eliminate seawater contact with metal are the best. I like the river wheel.
cubecube bean
cubecube bean 26 days ago
The Fuel Tank of Tomorrow - A Super Capacitor ruvid.net/video/video-3K8JIC-ov_Y.html
iedderf marano
iedderf marano Month ago
Can we convert also the shock absorbers of a car, so it hydraulicaly turns the motor generator to charge the battery of an electric car
Path Ray
Path Ray Month ago
How u make these animation.please say how.Using which software. All ur videos are so good.
Rob Johnson
Rob Johnson 2 months ago
Amazing. Why aren't we full bore on these technologies? With solar and wind, wow at the output the could be generated.
Cosmic Creative Science
nice
Rocky Rodriguez
Rocky Rodriguez 2 months ago
One of these technologies is the idea of a Filipino engineer during the seventies, it didn’t materialize during those time because the oil companies are against it.
Mehmet Şirin Bakan
Mehmet Şirin Bakan 2 months ago
Suyun gel git tile bukadar uğraşacaginiza suyun basıncını enerjiye çevirmeyen çalışın ben ingilzce bilmediğim hâlde az çok biseyler anladim
luckyisme10
luckyisme10 2 months ago
I have a better idea. .. use a hose to move water from one end to another with a turbine in the middle. Free endless energy using the ocean. Its based on a vacuum in a hose.
clyde ray emata
clyde ray emata 2 months ago
cool
krishna Bokan
krishna Bokan 2 months ago
Great 👌👍
Tadipatri ravi Tadipatri Ravi
waste project
Nomaid Brookyn
Nomaid Brookyn 2 months ago
There are countless ways to generate energy but the question is all about efficiency.
muhammad zameer
muhammad zameer 3 months ago
Excellent animation to learn yhe basic philosophy of conversion of waves energy into linear continuity towards power house having lot of fluctuation in tides.
Jose Lorenzo Colon
Jose Lorenzo Colon 3 months ago
excellent ideas for the generation of energy, we have to take the energy generation individualisadayo to me I have helped this technology bit.ly/2HjvePP thanks to this my residence is completely independent in its energy
SWOBIZ
SWOBIZ 4 months ago
It's 2019. Still waiting.
Gazr Gazr
Gazr Gazr 4 months ago
While there are fossil fuels to be had and money to be made, then this good idea will remain just that.
HHO Philippines
HHO Philippines 4 months ago
why not just put magnets in the float and a coil around the rod then anchor the rod from the top or bottom
Mykola Reznik
Mykola Reznik 4 months ago
можна простіше -через кулісний механізм перевести коливальний рух в крутящий рух генератора
ILMU TEKNOGI PANGAN
ILMU TEKNOGI PANGAN 5 months ago
good
Martin Kluge
Martin Kluge 5 months ago
ruvid.net/video/video-jpim4sqnzl0.html Energierevolution ruvid.net/video/video-r28z-PX22rA.html Energiekonverter: Modell
Bubbha Kush
Bubbha Kush 5 months ago
seams easy and fragile
David Yoseph Schreiber
Waves and tides will lift a big ship. However it is done slowly. The key to me seems to be how to utilize this huge strength even though the motion is slow.
Pamungkas Dewa
Pamungkas Dewa 6 months ago
Sip ini yang di butuhkan dunia
Visse Volker
Visse Volker 6 months ago
Need to minimize wear and tear from salinity. But these are small generators anyway. Need big power. Start with New York. Build a 100000 ton floating island or bridge and tether it by linkage to shore based geared generators. As the island rises and falls with the tide it would move with the worlds greatest torque. Think Biggest. We are running out of time. Think of the island hanging on 4 corner pistons 10 feet diameter each. When the tide goes out how much PSI would each piston produce per 1 foot tidal drop if the island weighs 10 million pounds and the compression ratio is 10 to 1 and a 6 foot stroke? Then add leverage to the design. Are you thinking yet? IBM's Watson for president.
Carlos Ucrós Piedrahita
www.ucrosenergysystem.com
Jean BERNEDE
Jean BERNEDE 7 months ago
Personaly.. I draw these system a few 40 years ago!!!...for to pump air....... By
ภาคศกร เฉลิมเชื้อ
nsddiklnpbhkiuoklougrsfdvnxgsaefkpngfsdvccekjthlvjxFsjglfehlhgcxxzassesgugtxx cjdkcj
Waldemar Ożóg
Waldemar Ożóg 7 months ago
😁😁😁😁😁👍😅😅😅😅
Humble Explorer
Humble Explorer 7 months ago
Love these ideas!!! I'm surprised you guys are still alive. Cause the big corporates would kill you guys for these free energy ideas.
An Sim
An Sim 7 months ago
El estupido que subio esto no se da cuenta que por el lado derecho el agua impacta con las aspas invertidas.... es un genio !
Red Rooster
Red Rooster 7 months ago
What about a tower to harvest electricity from the atmosphere? It will have no moving parts, it will require deep grounding belts or pipes and step-down transformers because the voltage goes up 100v a meter from memory? So a 1km high tower could generate 100k volts, I don't know what the amps would be though?
Rajesh K S
Rajesh K S 7 months ago
Those are surely some wonderful ideas. I loved the A and B series as I think they are most practical. And integration them on a single platform is surely efficient.
Chris Van Bekkum
Chris Van Bekkum 7 months ago
Has a (honest) cost v.s. benefit study been done ?? I hazard to guess that maintenace and operating cost will drive electricity prices sky high.
Jan Hansen
Jan Hansen 7 months ago
There are too many parts in the system that may break and require too much oversight, It is better with wave power station developed by Voith Hydro because there are much less parts and it can with few changes to offshore wind turbine towers and their foundation used ther as well to catch the wave energy too ruvid.net/video/video-gcStpg3i5V8.html
Harts Fire
Harts Fire 8 months ago
yep we have thousands around the globe lol not worth the cost to build or montane.the same with the electric car it looks good on paper but it will never happen, the interstructure will never support that much power demand and the cost to upgrade will make it so the cost of electric will be higher than diesel.green looks good and does have it's place but not on the road. diesel will end up to rule over the long hall.
joshua hofstein
joshua hofstein 8 months ago
And while all this is going on, Hector is going to be running 3 Honda Civics with spoon engines...and on top of that, he just went into Harry's and he ordered 3 T66 turbos, with NOS!!! And a Motec system exhaust...
NEW RENEWABLE ENERGY CONTROL
These are excellent ways to gather energy, now all you have to do is eliminate the accelerated mass losses in a turbine. A typical hydro-system only operates at 15% efficiency max due to accelerated mass losses. Compress air instead of water, insert a HyPEG unit and get about 5 times the amount of electricity for the same piston strokes offshore. New science. Check it out!
Robin Yilmaz
Robin Yilmaz 4 months ago
No, hydrodynamic generators are extremely efficient, up to and sometimes over 90%. I found this after some googling, and asking 2 thermodynamics professors at my university.
蓝色能源一刘工
蓝色能源一刘工 11 months ago
公司网站在哪里?谢谢!
Alex Nonzy
Alex Nonzy 11 months ago
How many cost total project ?
paul dean
paul dean 11 months ago
simply not feasible, seaweed and debris will constantly clog any kind of filter system and to get the best seal you can't just let debris into the pump chamber ,Anchored platform with booms and pontoons straight to generator is probably best effective way ,it's often ( KISS,keep it simple stupid ) I can see the forethought of off peak generation but we have bank stations ,and tides and currents change all the time ,if we only had clean sea's this would be viable off peak solution of energy power
Manoj Kanojiya
Hindi videos place
Quatermass
Quatermass Year ago
Simpler the better, and the more robust the better too. Whatever used would need to handle rough seas.
info CranleyTech
Check out this video ruvid.net/video/video-v-lJkeRHzAE.html (or short version ruvid.net/video/video-AG_vz2vHP7M.html) by cranleytech.com, there is some open water testing towards the end. It aims to get energy from the horizontal motion of the wave which is stronger in the near shore (
Buzz Werd
Buzz Werd Year ago
The 2-way turbine, I did not catch how it works. Do the vanes pivot?
Bruce Adams
Bruce Adams Year ago
To many moving parts. Why not just have one float riding the wave action move magnets passed coils in a vertical sealed column arrangement. One float and column per unit. One or two moving parts.
amit rajput
amit rajput 3 months ago
Why some sane person has not shot you yet
J D
J D 5 months ago
Awesome reduction of moving parts ......but, frequency cycles would only equal the water wave frequency and voltage output would also be lower than standard world voltages.Example if the water wave has a repetition frequency of 1 wave every 15 seconds you would have 4 cycles per minute machine. Now assuming that you could have consistent waves measuring the same peak to peak heights of 24 feet ... 1# 12 foot peak 1# 12 trough= equals 1# wave cycle every fifteen seconds ... right? suppose space one output coil every foot up and down and be able to alternate the magnet to coil engagement you would generate 6 cycles in one direction and 6 in the opposite , if you choose you can generate one cycle up... 12 coils up and one cycle down 12 coils down ... what voltage each coil produce is a mater of magnetic flux density and coil windings ..It would make power but nothing which resembles grid power , or even dc solar power ... it would be its own strange creation .Blue power , or green power a pipe dreams that would cost huge sums but at no savings to the customers even being free of fuel costs...to the UTILITY COMPANY ...they would justify the high cost of maintenance to never lower the KW HR price. THAT IS A WELL ESTABLISHED REALITY NOW.If resources were an issue a real issue , then it would make sense to use these systems that are and always will be devoid of reliable frequency and repetition ...not one day has the same wave action as another , same applies to solar or , wind .THE HOLY GRAIL OF ENERGY WAS INVENTED IN 1839 by WILLIAM ROBERT GROVE... NATURAL GAS IS INEXHAUSTIBLE , when reformed it produces HYDROGEN and when passed through the plates of a fuel cell , without combustion and purely by electron exchange ...out comes dc power and potable grade water as a product of heat condensation ... WHY IS IT NOT USED MORE WIDELY WORLD WIDE????ASK MILITANT IMBECILES WHO SHOUT "DANAGER NUCLEAR EXPLOSION " PRIMED TODO SO BY THOSE IN ENERGY PRODUCTION WHO PROFIT FROM CENTRALIZED POWER PRODUCTION AND WHO KNOWS WHOM ELSE.The centralization of power generation is a huge mistake , every community should have its own generation system POWER BY HYDROGEN DERIVED FROM NEVER ENDIG SOURCES OF NATURAL GAS ... WHICH IS THE ONLY TRULY INEXHAUSTIBLE SOURCE FOR IT AND MOREOVER BEING CONSTANTLY MADE BY MEN , PIGS COWS , TAKE YOU PICK ... BLUE POWER IS UNRELIABLE ...FART POWER IS CONSTANT.
mario galvan
mario galvan Year ago
Great ideas, the problems are the generators, in electrical energy production, the generator design's haven't changed in the last 50+ year's. Thus efficiency is not achievable.. check this web site Rhavenpowertech.com
Jean BERNEDE
Jean BERNEDE Year ago
J'ai déjà dessiné une machine de ce genre il y a 30 ans!!!!!!!!!! qui produirait de l'air comprimé ... lequel ferait fonctionner un moteur à pistons déjà existant depuis bien longtemps!!!!!.... ni compliqué, ni cher, éternel!!!.. pratiquement pas de risque de pannes... etc... il suffit qu'il y ait des vagues!!!.avec des flotteurs importants la force disponible serait considérable.. Au revoir les tarés!!!...
ros1tony
ros1tony Year ago
Never work... the environmentalists would never let "mother earths shoreline" be compromised by this contraption, they would eat the proposed companies alive.
M mangla
M mangla Year ago
Wow good
徐永長
徐永長 Year ago
Suspose the wrap magnetic ring surrounding cylinder outside, which up and down by waves, then the piston without piston rod we can see all parts should isolated from sea water pollution. the purpose for compress air to vessel. take pressured air push air motor, a generator connected with air motor.
Rakoto Briac
Rakoto Briac Year ago
You will build one big system like a bus to get 100 Watts of energy, Do the maths!
Mike's Garage
Mike's Garage Year ago
How much maintenance required? And who is going to do maintenance? Robots I hope ;)
clyd 1dal
clyd 1dal Year ago
Would work if could be interfaced with public access to the sea. long warfs that could serve as support platforms and recreation areas.
Ammar Yohanan
Ammar Yohanan Year ago
I think the energy problem is politicaly motivated otherwise there is a lot of solutions for it.
Lindon Jarvis
Lindon Jarvis Year ago
Good
oldgysgt
oldgysgt Year ago
None of this energy is "free". All of the hardware needed to convert the motion of ocean water into usable energy costs money, a lot of money. Can an ocean energy farm compete with fossil fuel generators? Maybe, but to say the energy is "free" is simply not true.
oldgysgt
oldgysgt Year ago
Iudowiko; you are correct about me not liking the word "free". Ninety nine percent of the time it is being used by some con-man to sell someone a blind horse. And, at one time oil DID come to the surface of the ground in Pennsylvania all by itself with no help from people, (but you didn't know that, did you). Wave energy, wind energy, solar energy, hydroelectric energy are all so called "renewable energy" and are there for the taking without mining cost, however, it takes MONEY to convert them into usable electric energy. You could say sunlight is "free", but try pricing a solar voltaic panel for your home, and you might understand what I am getting at. I don't know what you do for a living, but it's obvious you're not an electrical engineer, (or an economist).
Edgy Veggie O1G
I'll do you a favour and ignore the the fact that you're being condescending and arrogant. It's you who misunderstood the message and apparently is struggling with basic understanding of the English language. What your saying doesn't conflict with what I'm saying, but you're trying to disprove something that nobody has said or claimed during the video - this is what I'm trying to point out. Running a power plant has different types of costs like construction, maintenance and fuel costs. Renewable power plants have no fuel costs because once you established it, fueling the power plant, that is, propelling the generator that provides you electricity is done without any additional costs (=FREE), unlike in case of fossil fuel power plants, where fueling has many costs, as already described above. No one has claimed that establishing this or any other renewable energy power plant is at zero cost, so either you've misunderstood what has been said or you're just nitpicking because you don't like the word "free". Even though oil was at one time in Pennsylvania abundant, it didn't just come to the surface by itself, and even after finding it people didn't just burn oil where it was mined - it had to be transported to the power plant which required additional infrastructure. Also, power plants don't burn petrol as it comes to the surface, only parts of the material - other part is isolated and used in the chemical industry for producing different stuff. Not even mentioning the fact that oil is not a renewable resource, meaning the more we use the less we have left - which is technically not true for renewables, this is why they're called "renewables". :) So this eventually means, fueling fossil fuel power plants isn't free, because the fuel itself isn't free. Additionally, of course, there are additional costs like building the whole plant and maintaining it, as in case of EVERY industry. Nobody has ever said otherwise, that would be of course inaccurate.
oldgysgt
oldgysgt Year ago
Iudowiko; once again you don't understand the meaning of the word "free". A resource might be underground or simply oozing up in ponds waiting to be scooped up, like oil was at one time in Pennsylvania. The fact is it takes MONEY to turn any natural energy source into usable kilowatts. Like the man said, "There ain't no free lunch". If you find an ocean wave with a 110AC outlet in it, let me know. If you knew a little more about the nature of energy, you would know you cannot create energy, and you cannot destroy energy, you can only change its form. It's the changing from one form to another that takes effort, (AKA, money). Unfortunately the basics of physics are no longer taught in Liberal Arts Collages. Even the basics of economics are not well understood by most people today. If you believe in "free" anything, you do not understand how the world works. Just as there is no such thing as a vacuum, (it is only an absence of pressure), there is no such thing as "free" energy, (commercially usable energy).
Edgy Veggie O1G
oldgysgt well, your example is not very accurate, first of all because fossil fuel energy doesn't just happen to be out there, you need to invest into finding resources, mine them, transport them to the power plant, which take a whole lot of infrastructure. Not even mentioning that most fossil fuels aren't just burnt the way you mine them. And even if you do as above, resources deplet, so the cycle starts from the beginning. On the other hand hydropower energy, wind energy and solar energy are abundant and don't deplete, which means they're technically free. The only technological barrier we currently have is that natural resources will not always cover our energy needs so we would need to store them somehow which is quite problematic.
oldgysgt
oldgysgt Year ago
Iudowiko; you might as well say fossil fuel energy is free because it's source, oil, is laying there underground for the taking. Of course that's silly because it takes resources, (AKA Money), to turn that underground oil into Kilowatts of energy, just like it takes resources, (AKA Money), to turn wave action into Kilowatts. In both cases nature is providing the resource, but to say the resulting energy is free is simply not true. Look at it this way; if you buy an I-phone and the seller includes a case with it, is the case "free". Of course not; the selling price of the phone was calculated with the cost of the case included before the price tag was put on the phone. Don't be fooled by the word free.Ninety nine times out of a hundred the word "free" is being misused.
aditya dangwal
Unfortunately the system will work only if it is rotated with its natural frequency of rotation.
joseph-mario pelerin
sound like a skizo who have a fixation on reciprocating shaft into a cylinder... 1950 tech. even back then they knew better than thinking oceans are that easy to handle... nothing last in the waves.
Brian Johnson
Brian Johnson Year ago
Anything is better than burning fossil fuels. As long as the life of the equipment is efficient and does not require large man hours to maintain. 5 STARS
Renato de Tróia
Help me bring the ®Project WPP forward. It is the ideal solution to reduce pollution and bring clean drinking water to anywhere. ruvid.net/video/video-lsKV2Gz3i_E.html Contact: produtoraarmon@gmail.com
PEOPLE dOWER
PEOPLE dOWER Year ago
great but blocked by politics
Cymatic
Cymatic Year ago
222 Emirates didn't like this video...
george ivanus
george ivanus Year ago
it is so complex , no way can survive in a rough sea.
h4marine
h4marine Year ago
Searaser had working examples of this technology before 2011 look here ruvid.net/video/video-_9jGis5V5LE.html
Андрей Pancir
извращенцы
debendra gurung
lets make a v8
jana production
rapidtory.com/4Jxz power plant sri lanka
Kul Vel
Kul Vel Year ago
wonderful wheel and piston techniques. Let the world get clean n renewable energy so that our world is free of all kinds of poisonous materials for ever.
saood awais
saood awais Year ago
how to contact you.i emailed you but it didnt delivered.please reply
Mohamed Elmadawy
ممتاز توليد طاقه كهربيه للدول التى تقع على محيط او بحار وانهار
Heart Robber
Heart Robber Year ago
Magical Excel Sheet : See what happens when you ROLL THE DICE in SHEET. ruvid.net/video/video-SrfpWhjLzwg.html Kindly ! Like , Comment , Share !
VITTHAL RATHOD
Good
prasad karri
prasad karri Year ago
I think this process is very expensive
rushi ns
rushi ns Year ago
I have developed an idea to enhance the intensity of tides by 10 times at zero cost.Since it requires lengthy explanation i am not elaborating on that. You can take it for granted that it is possible to create terrific gush of tides. You can improve your project based on this extra advantage . you can contact me at email ; maavooru321@gmail.com
jorge S
jorge S Year ago
this isnt new just slow to put into action.. same reason Geo wont get pushed
john cuting
john cuting Year ago
what about a giant horizontal piston that is pushed with the tides
קובי אשכנזי
רעיונות נחמדים ! צריך לבחור מיקום שבו הגלים אחידים יחסית לאורך השנה (בד"כ כשהגלים נוגעים בחוף מישורי). במקרים כאלה יהיה מרחק גדול יחסית בין מקום אגירת המים למקום שאיבת המים. כמו כן יש לשאוב כמות משמעותית של מים כדי להניע טורבינה בגודל בנוני ומעלה. אבל בגדול הרעיון נראה בר יישום ושווה לבדוק אותו !
Bumblebee 003
Bumblebee 003 Year ago
شو بدك !!
VICENTE FRANCISCO CALDERON ORTIZ
🔥⚡️🙉👄🎖🤷🏼‍♀️🎱 Video de Taylor Swift Sex ruvid.net/video/video-FBScYYaoeRc1.htmlEnh_
Dailis Smildzers
There is way toooo much moving parts involved in this. High maintenance costs.
wichaksono soenarko
can u give me your email
AKAZZIM KARIM
AKAZZIM KARIM Year ago
hello I have a new and good idea can you contact me plaise
speedbuggy16v
speedbuggy16v Year ago
someone has obviously seen what happens to metal in a marine environment....................
José Bidouille
stop mecanics on sea water please....
Chris O'Connor
Why don't you just put the turbine right where the current or wave like 'flow' is
Iceflower 700
Iceflower 700 Year ago
instead of having a water wheel pump water to a separate turbine, or pump air to a separate turbine, why not just have the water wheel be the turbine? these inventors are trying to reinvent the wheel
签约2012
签约2012 Year ago
海浪发电机
1.61803398875
1.61803398875 Year ago
Personally I don't think you would generate much electricity out of this device. It is better and more efficient to generate electricity from the Hydroelectric pwer station.
1.61803398875
1.61803398875 Year ago
Not sure how much energy you can generate and it is also depends on the waves hight. Why didn't any1 think of it b4 it is because, there arn't much energy generated by this devices. The total energy of the wave must not exceed the total energy of the system ie. Etot=Egen.+Elost. This needs to be calcuated since if Elost
Merg Sun
Merg Sun Year ago
bullshit
Geographer 4 fun
Anything that touch salt water is heavily expensive to maintain. ...
Prashant Fauzadar
except plastic
Stephen Donoghue
Geographer 4 fun plastic
Claudio
Claudio Year ago
True
Sarwar Nezar
Sarwar Nezar Year ago
Those systems are not sustainable renewable energy due to low energy out put, high energy input to build each one and cost of building. Also you need to look at many problems facing those systems like continues pipes clog due to the impurity of sea water (slat), storm and corrosion. They are just too expensive to maintain. Wind turbine is far more better to maintain than those system and they can be placed to float in the sea. Even though wind turbine is much more easier maintain and has higher energy out-put but is still consider as an expensive way to gain energy. End of fossil fuels = end of industrial revolution.
texas coot
texas coot Year ago
Why not intergrate this into ships. Ships push against water creating drag. You could put a couple of tubes down the hull of the ship allowing water to pass through them and they can spin any turbine to create power and it would reduce the amount of resistance of the water against the ship. Also have you heard of friction motor? Like they have in toy cars? You could use a bigger one to help keep speed of generators stable. But hey thats just my 2 cents.
صلاح البغدادي
جيد 👍
Lovelock Matt
Lovelock Matt Year ago
the paddle one is a piece of shit
Reginaldo Martins
Se for por em pratica é um projeto bem interessante.
Claudio
Claudio Year ago
Reginaldo Martins sim pocerá ser. Mas atenção à manutenção. Poderá ser cara.
Bhrigu Roy
Bhrigu Roy Year ago
sea water in pistons what about corrosion ?
Jaap Ketel
Jaap Ketel Year ago
All rotating metal mechanical devices will eventually corrode and/or break down in seawater environment. The best alternative is use all composites. Excellent example is www.pobber.nl
Jayesh Suryawanshi
Please mention cost of projects
Next videos
7 STRANGEST New Engines
05:38
The Gravity Wheel
07:42
Views 1 200 000
iOS 13 Beta 2 - What's New?
11:59